Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.6K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.6K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

82
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
82
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

70
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
70
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.9K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

13.7K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
13.7K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

4.3K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
4.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prenatal famine exposure restricts genetic effects on birth weight with implications for metabolic disease risk.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Epigenome-wide association study of circulating interleukin-6 connects DNA methylation to immunometabolic and inflammatory health.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

A common food mutagen promotes intestinal carcinogenesis by multiple mechanisms in mouse models of Lynch syndrome.

NAR cancer·2025
Same author

Determining off-target effects of splice-switching antisense oligonucleotides using short read RNAseq in neuronally differentiated human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Human molecular genetics·2025
Same author

DNA methylation of genes involved in lipid metabolism drives adiponectin levels and metabolic disease.

Diabetologia·2025
Same author

Identification of SENP7 and UTF1/VENTX as new loci influencing clustered protocadherin methylation across blood and brain using a genome-wide association study.

Molecular psychiatry·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 14, 2025

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
08:27

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

4.6K

Omixer: multivariate and reproducible sample randomization to proactively counter batch effects in omics studies.

Lucy Sinke1, Davy Cats1, Bastiaan T Heijmans1

  • 1Molecular Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden 2333 ZC, The Netherlands.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|March 11, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Batch effects in omics studies can cause bias. Omixer, a new Bioconductor package, offers reproducible sample randomization to proactively minimize these technical variations.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
08:51

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts

Published on: September 20, 2024

1.7K
An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience
10:56

An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience

Published on: April 13, 2019

7.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 14, 2025

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
08:27

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

4.6K
Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
08:51

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts

Published on: September 20, 2024

1.7K
An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience
10:56

An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience

Published on: April 13, 2019

7.5K

Area of Science:

  • Omics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Batch effects significantly impact omics study results, introducing bias and leading to false positives.
  • Existing methods for controlling batch effects through sample randomization are often inadequate, poorly documented, and lack the flexibility for complex experimental designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robust software solution for preemptive control of batch effects in omics studies.
  • To implement a multivariate and reproducible sample randomization strategy to mitigate bias in omics data.

Main Methods:

  • Development of Omixer, a Bioconductor package.
  • Implementation of multivariate sample randomization algorithms.
  • Optimization of sample distribution across experimental batches to minimize technical factor correlations with biological variables.

Main Results:

  • Omixer enables proactive management of batch effects by ensuring balanced sample distribution.
  • The package facilitates reproducible randomization, crucial for the reliability of omics data.
  • Demonstrated ability to counter correlations between technical factors and biological variables of interest.

Conclusions:

  • Omixer provides a vital tool for researchers to improve the quality and reliability of omics studies.
  • The software addresses the lack of effective preemptive strategies for controlling batch effects.
  • Omixer enhances the validity of omics findings by minimizing bias and false positives.