Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 14, 2025

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Late results after mitral valve replacement with Mosaic bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or younger
Giovanni A Chiariello1,2, Anne-Sophie Beraud3, Olivier Vahdat1
1Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
Objectives:
Although in younger patients indications for biological prosthesis implantation in mitral valve replacement remain controversial, recently bioprostheses use increased considerably. We present late results obtained with the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or younger.
Methods:
Between 2007 and 2017, 67 mitral Mosaic bioprostheses were implanted in patients aged 65 years or younger (58.5 ± 6.4 years). Follow-up extended up to 13 years. Survival, freedom from structural valve degeneration, endocarditis, thromboembolic events and reoperation were considered as main clinical end points evaluated at 1, 5 and 10 years.
Results:
The mean follow-up was 4.7 ± 2.8 years. Overall mortality rate was 12%. At 1, 5 and 10 years, survival was 94 ± 3%, 89 ± 4% and 77 ± 9%, respectively. Freedom from structural valve degeneration was 100%, 94 ± 4% and 71 ± 21%. Freedom from endocarditis was 95 ± 3%, 90 ± 6% and 84 ± 8%. Freedom from thromboembolic events was 94 ± 3%, 90 ± 5% and 90 ± 5%. Freedom from reoperation was 94 ± 3%, 87 ± 5% and 65 ± 19%.
Conclusions:
Mosaic bioprosthesis appears a valid mitral valve substitute even when employed in ≤65-year-old patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

