Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 14, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Cardiovascular Profile of Patients with Metabolic Syndrome
Published on: September 27, 2024
Carotid intima-media thickness and cardiovascular risk factors in healthy volunteers
Birgit-Christiane Zyriax1,2, Kira Dransfeld3, Eberhard Windler4
1Midwifery Science-Health Care Research and Prevention, Preventive Medicine and Nutrition, German Center for Health Services Research in Dermatology (CVderm), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany. b.zyriax@uke.de.
Insights
Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) shows partial correlation with cardiovascular risk factors in low-risk individuals. Combining CIMT with risk scores may enhance cardiovascular risk prediction for healthier populations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
- Preventive Medicine
Background:
- Traditional cardiovascular risk scores often lack sensitivity, failing to identify many individuals who will develop cardiovascular disease, especially those at low risk.
- Current risk assessment methods may not adequately capture the risk in individuals without diagnosed cardiovascular risk factors.
- There is a need for improved methods to predict cardiovascular risk, particularly in seemingly healthy populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the correlation between carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and established cardiovascular risk factors and scores.
- To assess the potential of combining CIMT measurements with conventional risk factors or scores for enhanced cardiovascular risk prediction.
- To evaluate the predictive value of CIMT in individuals without overt cardiovascular risk factors.
Main Methods:
- The study involved 213 healthy participants (107 women, 106 men) aged 30-70 years, without diagnosed cardiovascular risk factors.
- Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) was measured using B-mode ultrasonography.
- Statistical analyses included t-tests, Chi-squared tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients, and multiple linear regression.
Main Results:
- Age, systolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, lipid profiles (total, LDL, non-HDL cholesterol), and waist circumference were significantly associated with CIMT (P ≤ 0.03).
- Common cardiovascular risk scores (Framingham, PROCAM, ESC) showed significant but moderate correlations with CIMT.
- The Framingham Risk Score incorporating BMI demonstrated the strongest correlation, explaining 27% of CIMT variance in men and 20% in women.
Conclusions:
- In low-risk individuals, CIMT and cardiovascular risk factors exhibit only partial correlation, indicating limitations in current risk assessment.
- Combining CIMT with conventional risk factors or scores may improve cardiovascular risk prediction in individuals at low cardiovascular risk.
- Further research in large prospective cohorts is needed to validate the clinical benefit of combined risk prediction strategies for cardiovascular events in healthy, low-risk populations.
Background:
Assessment of cardiovascular risk by scores lacks sensitivity and leaves the majority of future cardiovascular patients unidentified particularly individuals at low cardiovascular risk. The present analysis investigates into the correlation of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and cardiovascular risk factors and derived scores as to the potential of improved cardiovascular risk prediction by combining the two.
Methods:
The Stress, Atherosclerosis and ECG Study (STRATEGY) is a cross-sectional study of selectively healthy 107 women and 106 men without diagnosed and treated cardiovascular risk factors evenly distributed between 30 and 70 years. CIMT was determined by evaluating B-mode ultrasonograms offline according to a standardized protocol. The unpaired t-test was used to compare normal-distributed continuous variables, the Chi-squared test for normal-distributed categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normal distributed continuous variables. The association between risk prediction scores and CIMT was calculated by the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Pearson correlation coefficient was used for the correlation between cardiovascular risk factors and CIMT. A multiple linear regression analysis was executed for the association of cardiovascular risk factors and CIMT.
Results:
Age, systolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, total, LDL- and non-HDL-cholesterol and waist circumference were significantly associated with CIMT (each P ≤ 0.03). The Framingham Risk Score, the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster Study Score and the European Society of Cardiology Score correlated significantly but only moderately with CIMT. The Framingham Risk Score considering BMI correlated most strongly and predicted 27% of the CIMT variance in men and 20% in women.
Conclusion:
In individuals without overt cardiovascular risk factors and thus at low cardiovascular risk, CIMT and cardiovascular risk factors correlated only partially suggesting that combining CIMT and conventional risk factors or common derived scores may improve risk prediction in individuals at low cardiovascular risk. The clinical benefit as to cardiovascular events of such combined risk prediction needs to be explored in large prospective cohorts of still healthy low-risk volunteers. DRKS ID DRKS00015209 07/02/2019 retrospectively registered https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=resultsExt.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

