Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

6.9K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
6.9K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

12.3K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
12.3K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

3.3K
3.3K
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

158
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
158
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

419
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
419
Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

190
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
190

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pediatric resting EEG collection, preprocessing, and analysis: A systematic review.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Attention Focusing Moderates the Association Between Parent Anxiety and Attention Bias to Threat in Youth with Social Anxiety Disorder.

Child psychiatry and human development·2026
Same author

Error-Related Memory Biases Are Specific to Social Stimuli for Socially Anxious Individuals.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Integrating Multimodal Neuroimaging of Error Monitoring to Estimate Future Anxiety in Adolescents.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Social observation influences the trajectory of performance monitoring across trials: evidence from single-trial estimates of the ERN and CRN.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

CINV1 and CINV2 are required for increased tolerance to diverse stresses after ethylene-pretreatment of germinating seeds.

PloS one·2025
Same journal

Neural Sensitivity to Conversational Inter-Speaker Gaps in the Broad Autism Phenotype.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Open Communication Can Lead to Equivalent EEG Data Quality for Black Women: Multilevel Modeling Interindividual Differences on Emotional Scene and Face Perception.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

What's in a Mean? Comparing Interbeat Interval Averaging Methods Across Variability Levels and Window Lengths.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Model-Free and Model-Based Learning in Human Fear Conditioning.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Examining the Impact of Acute Exercise and Arousal Reappraisal on Stressor-Evoked Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Hierarchical Dimensions of Psychopathology.

Psychophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 13, 2025

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.3K

Subthreshold error corrections predict adaptive post-error compensations.

Paul J Beatty1, George A Buzzell2, Daniel M Roberts1

  • 1Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.

Psychophysiology
|March 12, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Even undetected errors trigger brain activity that improves subsequent performance. This study shows subthreshold error corrections enhance post-error speeding and accuracy, highlighting their adaptive role in cognitive control.

Keywords:
EEGERNaction-monitoringconflicterrorslateralized beta suppressiontheta powertime-frequency

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.9K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 13, 2025

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.3K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.9K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Subthreshold error corrections and their behavioral impact remain poorly understood.
  • Error monitoring processes are crucial for adaptive behavior and learning.
  • The Simon task is a well-established paradigm for studying response conflict.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between subthreshold error corrections and post-error behavioral adjustments.
  • To utilize lateralized beta power as an index for subthreshold error correction.
  • To explore the adaptive nature of response conflict in error processing.

Main Methods:

  • Employing the Simon task to induce response conflict.
  • Measuring lateralized beta power, specifically ipsilateral beta suppression, as an indicator of corrective response activation.
  • Analyzing single-trial data to correlate neural activity with subsequent behavioral outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Greater ipsilateral beta suppression predicted faster reaction times and improved accuracy on subsequent trials, even without overt error correction.
  • Evidence suggests that subthreshold error correction mechanisms are active even when overt corrections are absent.
  • Findings support the adaptive role of response conflict in enhancing performance after errors.

Conclusions:

  • Subthreshold error corrections play a significant role in post-error behavioral adaptations.
  • Error-monitoring processes should incorporate these subthreshold mechanisms for a comprehensive understanding.
  • The study dissociates post-error slowing and accuracy, and further differentiates frontal midline theta and error-related negativity (ERN).