Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Orthographic ambiguity: comments on Baxter and Warrington.

R Goodman-Schulman¹

¹Department of Psychology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior

|March 1, 1988

Summary

This commentary questions findings on acquired dysgraphia patient KT, suggesting Baxter and Warrington

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

In defense of a modular architecture for the number-processing system: reply to Campbell and Clark.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·1989

Same author

Patterns of dysgraphia and the nonlexical spelling process.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·1987

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Neuropsychology
Linguistics

Background:

A study by Baxter and Warrington examined acquired dysgraphia in patient KT.
Their findings suggested an orthographic regularity effect and atypical sound-to-spelling mapping in KT's spelling.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate the methodology and conclusions of Baxter and Warrington's study on patient KT.
To assess the implications of KT's spelling performance for dominant models of spelling.

Main Methods:

Re-examination of the data analysis procedures employed by Baxter and Warrington.
Identification of potential confounding variables in the analysis of spelling performance.

Main Results:

Baxter and Warrington's analysis collapsed crucial factors influencing spelling.
The identified orthographic regularity effect and sound-to-spelling mapping patterns in KT may be artifacts of the analysis.

Conclusions:

The results from patient KT, as analyzed, cannot definitively challenge existing models of spelling.
Further investigation with refined analytical methods is required to understand acquired dysgraphia and spelling processes.

Related Experiment Videos