Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 13, 2025

Clinical Practice Protocol of Creative Music Therapy for Preterm Infants and Their Parents in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Published on: January 7, 2020
Revisions of clinical protocols using the Plan Do Check Act cycle improved outcomes of extremely preterm infants at
Mamoru Saikusa1, Masahiro Kinoshita1, Kennosuke Tsuda1,2
1Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Insights
Iterative protocol revisions significantly improved outcomes for preterm infants. This quality improvement approach enhanced infant survival and reduced serious adverse events through systematic changes.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Clinical Quality Improvement
- Pediatric Healthcare
Background:
- Established clinical protocols can hinder quality improvement initiatives.
- Systematic revisions are needed to optimize care for vulnerable populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of iterative protocol revisions on the outcomes of preterm infants.
- To determine if a Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle approach improves neonatal care quality.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of preterm infants (<28 weeks gestation) from 2006-2015.
- Implementation of protocol changes in 2008 and 2012 using PDCA cycles.
- Comparison of adverse outcomes (death, motor/sensory impairments) before and after protocol revisions.
Main Results:
- Adverse outcomes were significantly reduced in the periods following protocol changes (2008-2011 and 2012-2015) compared to the baseline (2006-2007).
- Specific changes included adjustments to surfactant, nutrition, respiratory support, and early infant stabilization.
- Statistical significance was achieved for outcome improvements in both post-revision periods (p=0.013 and p=0.035).
Conclusions:
- Bottom-up, iterative protocol revisions tailored to local settings can effectively improve preterm infant outcomes.
- Continuous quality improvement cycles are crucial for optimizing neonatal intensive care.
Aim:
Clinical quality improvement is often cumbersome due to established protocols. We aimed to investigate whether outcomes of preterm infants improve with protocol revisions using iteration cycles.
Methods:
Preterm infants born <28 weeks gestation between January 2006 and December 2015 were retrospectively analysed. Protocols were revised using Plan Do Check Act cycle. Death and serious adverse events at term were reviewed in six-monthly quality improvement meetings. Adverse outcome of death or motor/sensory impairments at two years was compared before and after two major protocol changes, which were implemented in January 2008 and January 2012.
Results:
Based on the appraisal for period 2006-2007, strategies for surfactant, narcotics, parenteral nutrition, respiratory gas humidity and prophylactic indomethacin and antibiotics were changed for period 2008-2011. For period 2012-2015, stabilisation of infants was accelerated via very early catheterisation. Of 162 infants (84 males, 25.5 ± 1.5 weeks gestation) within the whole cohort, 63 developed adverse outcomes, which were fewer for periods 2008-2011 (p = 0.013) and 2012-2015 (p = 0.035) compared with period 2006-2007 (adjusted for gestational age, Apgar scores and sex).
Conclusion:
Careful bottom-up revisions of protocols using iteration cycles, accounting for local settings, successfully improved the outcomes of preterm infants.
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care II
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Standards of Care I
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Planning Nursing Care II
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...

