Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 13, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Solving the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) problem using a sequential convex programming method
Pınar Dursun1, Masoud Zarepisheh1, Gourav Jhanwar1
1Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
Abstract:
The volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) problem is highly non-convex and much more difficult than the fixed-field intensity modulated radiotherapy optimization problem. To solve it efficiently, we propose a sequential convex programming algorithm that solves a sequence of convex optimization problems. Beginning by optimizing the aperture weights of many (72) evenly distributed beams using the beam's eye view of the target from each direction as the initial aperture shape, the search space is constrained to allowing the leaves to move within a pre-defined step-size. A convex approximation problem is introduced and solved to optimize the leaf positions and the aperture weights within the search space. The algorithm is equipped with both local and global search strategies, whereby a global search is followed by a local search: a large step-size results in a global search with a less accurate convex approximation, followed by a small step-size local search with an accurate convex approximation. The performance of the proposed algorithm is tested on three patients with three different disease sites (paraspinal, prostate and oligometastasis). The algorithm generates VMAT plans comparable to the ideal 72-beam fluence map optimized plans (i.e. IMRT plans before leaf sequencing) in 14 iterations and 36 mins on average. The algorithm is also tested on a small down-sampled prostate case for which we could computationally afford to obtain the ground-truth by solving the non-convex mixed-integer optimization problem exactly. This general algorithm is able to produce results essentially equivalent to the ground-truth but 12 times faster. The algorithm is also scalable and can handle real clinical cases, whereas the ground-truth solution using mixed-integer optimization can only be obtained for highly down-sampled cases.
More Related Videos
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
08:25Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
Published on: April 11, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution: Problem Solving
This distribution function f(v) is defined by saying that the expected number N (v1,v2) of particles with speeds between v1 and v2 is given by
Radiation Pressure: Problem Solving
The average value of the rate of momentum transfer divided by the absorbing area represents the average force...
Method of Sections: Problem Solving II
Uniform Depth Channel Flow: Problem Solving
Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving