Decompressive craniectomy combined with mild hypothermia in patients with large hemispheric infarction: a randomized

Linlin Fan1, Yingying Su2, Yan Zhang1

  • 1Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, No. 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, China.

BMC Neurology
|March 13, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Hypothermia combined with decompressive craniectomy (DC) for large hemispheric infarction (LHI) did not significantly reduce long-term mortality or improve outcomes. Local cooling showed a trend toward better results in survivors with fewer complications.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Neurosurgery
  • Critical Care Medicine

Background:

  • Large hemispheric infarction (LHI) poses significant mortality risks.
  • The efficacy of hypothermia in conjunction with decompressive craniectomy (DC) for LHI remains debated.
  • This study investigates therapeutic outcomes of combining DC with different hypothermia methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of decompressive craniectomy (DC) combined with hypothermia on mortality and neurological outcomes in patients with large hemispheric infarction (LHI).
  • To compare the effectiveness of head surface cooling (DCSC) versus endovascular hypothermia (DCEH) alongside DC.

Main Methods:

  • Patients with LHI were randomized into three groups: DC alone (normothermia), DC with head surface cooling (DCSC), and DC with endovascular hypothermia (DCEH).
  • Outcomes including mortality and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were assessed at 6 months post-intervention.
  • Complication rates were also recorded for each treatment group.

Main Results:

  • While initial discharge mortality varied, 6-month mortality showed no significant difference between groups (44.4% DC, 21.4% DCSC, 45.5% DCEH).
  • Good neurological outcomes (mRS 0-3) were achieved by 35.3% of patients, with a trend favoring the DCSC group (42.9%) over DC (22.2%) and DCEH (36.4%), though not statistically significant.
  • The endovascular hypothermia group experienced a higher incidence of complications (18.9%) compared to DCSC (12.0%) and DC (12.1%).

Conclusions:

  • Current evidence does not confirm that hypothermia significantly improves long-term survival or neurological outcomes in LHI patients undergoing DC.
  • A trend suggests potential benefits for survivors with hypothermia, particularly with local cooling methods.
  • Local cooling (DCSC) may be a preferable strategy for DC patients due to a lower risk of systemic complications.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos