Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 13, 2025

Simultaneous Quantification of T-Cell Receptor Excision Circles TRECs and K-Deleting Recombination Excision Circles KRECs by Real-time PCR
Published on: December 6, 2014
Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency: clinical and cost-effectiveness approaches
Oksana Boyarchuk1, Nataliia Yarema1, Mariia Kinash1
1Department of Children's Diseases and Pediatric Surgery, I.Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ukraine.
Insights
Newborn screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) using T-cell receptor (TREC) and kappa-deleting recombination excision circle (KREC) assays is crucial for early diagnosis. Pilot studies are needed to determine the most effective screening methods and algorithms for implementation.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Genetics
- Public Health
Background:
- Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) is a life-threatening condition requiring early diagnosis to prevent infectious complications.
- Newborn screening using TREC and KREC assays identifies T- and B-lymphopenia, aiding early SCID detection.
- While TREC assay screening is proven effective, its clinical benefits and costs vary globally.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the necessity of pilot projects for establishing SCID screening reference values.
- To determine the cost-effectiveness and expediency of implementing TREC and KREC assays for SCID screening.
- To assess the most effective screening method (TREC or TREC/KREC) and algorithm for SCID detection in Ukraine.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing studies on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of TREC assay for SCID screening.
- Analysis of the potential benefits and economic costs of implementing newborn screening programs.
- Proposal for pilot studies to establish country-specific reference values and optimal screening algorithms.
Main Results:
- Existing studies support the clinical and cost-effectiveness of TREC assay for SCID screening.
- Global variations in clinical benefits and costs necessitate country-specific pilot projects.
- The advancement of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Ukraine creates an opportunity for SCID newborn screening.
Conclusions:
- Pilot studies are essential to establish reference TREC and KREC levels for SCID diagnosis and assess cost-effectiveness.
- Determining the optimal screening method (TREC or TREC/KREC) and algorithm is crucial for effective SCID detection.
- Ukraine has the potential to implement newborn screening for SCID, with pilot studies guiding the process.
Abstract:
Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is a group of lifethreatening diseases, for which early diagnostics, before the development of infectious complications, is extremely important. Newborn screening for SCID with T-cell receptor excision circle (TREC) and kappa-deleting recombination excision circle (KREC) assay for the identification of T- and B-lymphopenia has been implemented in a number of highly developed countries of the world. A number of studies proved the clinical and cost-effectiveness of screening for SCID by using TREC assay. However, both clinical benefits and economic costs for screening may vary depending on country and continent, requiring pilot projects to establish reference values of TREC and KREC levels for the diagnosis of SCID and other diseases associated with T- and B-lymphopenia, as well as determination of cost-effectiveness/costbenefit ratio and expediency of their further implementation. Other challenges, outlined in the article, need to be solved. The development of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Ukraine opens up full opportunities for the implementation of newborn screening for SCID. The expediency of conducting a pilot study to determine the most effective method (TREC or TREC/KREC) and the algorithm for SCID detection has been shown.
More Related Videos
06:46A High-Throughput Multiplexed Screening for Type 1 Diabetes, Celiac Diseases, and COVID-19
Published on: July 5, 2022
07:08A High Throughput, Multiplexed and Targeted Proteomic CSF Assay to Quantify Neurodegenerative Biomarkers and Apolipoprotein E Isoforms Status
Published on: October 20, 2016