Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing Perioperative Risk According to Surgical Route in Hysterectomy for Very Large Uteri.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2026
Same author

Injuries Associated with Peritoneal Entry Device in Laparoscopic Surgery: An Analysis of Reports to the FDA.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2026
Same author

Infectious Morbidity Risk of Laparoscopic Myomectomy Concomitant Hysteroscopy: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Analysis.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2026
Same author

Gliomatosis Peritonei with Endometriosis and Mature Cystic Teratomas: An Intraoperative Mimic.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2026
Same author

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound for Adenomyosis-A Blinded, Retrospective, Single-Expert Validation Study of the 2022 MUSA Guidelines.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2025
Same author

Endometriosis Communities on Reddit: Quantitative Analysis.

Journal of medical Internet research·2025
Same journal

vNOTES Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Pain, Opioid Use, and Quality of Recovery.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2026
Same journal

De Novo Isthmocele Formation Following Cesarean Delivery in Uterus Transplant Recipients.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2026
Same journal

Retroperitoneal Field Development Time as a Procedure-Specific Learning Metric in Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy: A CUSUM-Based Analysis.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2026
Same journal

Regarding ''Low-Pressure Versus Standard-Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis''.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2026
Same journal

Central sensitization and hormonal therapy failure for endometriosis-related pain symptoms: a prospective study.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2026
Same journal

Regarding: "Excision of Atypical Endometrioma from the Myometrium".

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
03:05

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

Published on: February 16, 2024

1.3K

Risk-prediction Model for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

Kristen Pepin1, Francis Cook2, Parmida Maghsoudlou3

  • 1Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital (Drs. Pepin and Cohen, and Ms. Maghsoudlou); Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York (Dr. Pepin).

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
|March 13, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new risk-prediction model can identify patients at higher risk for adverse outcomes during laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). This tool aids in surgical planning and patient counseling for this common gynecologic procedure.

Keywords:
Body mass indexComplicationPredictionRaceSurgeon volume

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
03:30

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.9K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

498

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
03:05

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

Published on: February 16, 2024

1.3K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
03:30

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.9K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

498

Area of Science:

  • Gynecologic Surgery
  • Surgical Risk Prediction
  • Health Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) is a common procedure for benign gynecologic conditions.
  • Predicting adverse outcomes in LH is crucial for patient safety and surgical planning.
  • Existing models may not fully capture the multifactorial risks associated with LH.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a predictive model for adverse outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications.
  • To identify key patient, surgical, and institutional factors associated with adverse events.
  • To provide a tool for enhanced risk stratification and informed decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of 3441 patients undergoing LH at a large academic center (2009-2017).
  • Data collected on patient demographics, surgical history, operative details, and perioperative adverse outcomes.
  • Logistic regression model developed using a derivation cohort and validated on a separate cohort.

Main Results:

  • The overall rate of composite adverse outcomes was 14.1%.
  • A 6-variable model identified race, history of laparotomy/laparoscopy, predicted uterine weight, BMI, and surgeon volume as predictors.
  • The model demonstrated good discrimination (c-statistics 0.74 and 0.72) and was best calibrated for lower-risk patients.

Conclusions:

  • A validated risk-prediction model for laparoscopic hysterectomy adverse outcomes has been developed.
  • The model incorporates readily available preoperative and intraoperative factors.
  • This tool can aid clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and optimizing surgical management.