Connecting a simulated virtual patient program with experiential practicums: Perspectives from year three students

Research indicates that the simulated learning tools known as virtual patients (VPs) are valued by pharmacy students and impact students' knowledge and confidence. However, research is needed to understand how students can be supported to make intended connections between VP cases and real-life clinical scenarios. The purpose of this study was to examine whether and how VP cases influence students' clinical reasoning skills, confidence, thought processes, and preparedness for their experiential practicums.

Third-year entry-to-practice doctor of pharmacy students who had completed at least one VP case in second year prior to their experiential practicums were surveyed in fall 2018 after having completed their experiential practicums. Surveys were structured to solicit student perceptions related to how students bridged VP cases and real-life clinical scenarios and were analyzed using a mixed-methods design.

Forty-three students completed the survey. Students perceived that VP cases most significantly impacted their clinical reasoning skills due to the opportunity cases afforded them to explore patient data and navigate relevant information. The largest limitation of VP cases to students' learning was that the cases differed from their experiences. Students' suggestions included opportunities for more practice using VP cases and an expanded repertoire of medical conditions offered through case exposure.

More research is needed to understand how to help students connect VP cases to their experiential practicums to make them more effective learning tools.