Efficacy of Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Preventing Infections in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 13, 2025

Assessment of Antibody-based Drugs Effects on Murine Bone Marrow and Peritoneal Macrophage Activation
Published on: December 26, 2017
Guido Lancman1, Katleen Lozada2, Nida Athar2
1Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Introduction:
Despite many recent advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), infection remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Prior studies have shown mixed results using intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) to prevent infections in MM and were conducted prior to most modern MM therapies.
Patients And Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed all patients with MM treated with IVIG at our institution from 2010 to 2017. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of infectious events (IEs) per patient-year during IVIG versus observation.
Results:
A total of 68 patients were included; 151 IEs occurred during 918 months of IVIG treatment, whereas 446 IEs occurred during 2484 months of observation. Although the annual rate of IEs was substantially higher during periods of progressive disease (PD) compared with non-PD (4.9 vs. 1.8; P < .001), most IEs occurred during periods of non-PD (75% vs. 25% during PD). There was no overall difference in the annual rate of IEs per patient between IVIG and observation (1.97 vs. 2.16; IRR, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.10; P = .376). The subgroup of patients with hypogammaglobulinemia and whose myeloma was in a non-PD phase had a significant reduction in all-grade IEs (1.20 vs. 1.92; IRR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45-0.88; P = .009) and ≥ grade 3 IEs (0.25 vs. 0.56; IRR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.94; P = .041) with IVIG compared with observation.
Conclusion:
Although treatment with IVIG did not show benefit in the overall population, there may be subgroups of patients that derive significant benefit. Additional observational studies are needed to confirm these findings and further refine patient selection.
Insights
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) did not reduce infections in all multiple myeloma (MM) patients. However, IVIG significantly decreased infections in a subgroup with hypogammaglobulinemia during non-progressive disease.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Immunology
- Oncology
Background:
- Infections are a major cause of mortality in multiple myeloma (MM) patients despite treatment advances.
- Previous studies on intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for infection prevention in MM yielded mixed results and predated modern MM therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of IVIG in preventing infectious events (IEs) in MM patients.
- To identify potential subgroups of MM patients who may benefit from IVIG therapy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 68 MM patients treated with IVIG between 2010 and 2017.
- Comparison of the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of infectious events per patient-year during IVIG treatment versus observation periods.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in the overall annual rate of IEs per patient between IVIG and observation (IRR, 0.92; P = .376).
- A significant reduction in all-grade IEs (IRR, 0.63; P = .009) and grade ≥3 IEs (IRR, 0.45; P = .041) was observed in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia during non-progressive disease (non-PD) on IVIG.
- Infectious events were substantially higher during progressive disease (PD) compared to non-PD (4.9 vs. 1.8).
Conclusions:
- Overall, IVIG did not demonstrate a significant benefit in reducing infections for the general MM population.
- Specific subgroups, particularly those with hypogammaglobulinemia in a non-PD phase, may benefit from IVIG for infection reduction.
- Further observational studies are required to confirm these findings and optimize patient selection for IVIG therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Myasthenia Gravis: Overview and Treatment
These antibodies interfere with the function of the nicotinic receptors in three ways: by binding to the receptor and disrupting acetylcholine binding; by causing cross-linking of receptors which...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention

