Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 13, 2025
Morphological and Functional Assessment of the Right Ventricle Using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
Novel Echocardiographic Algorithm for Right Ventricular Mass Quantification: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and
Jonathan Kochav1, Jennifer Chen2, Lakshmi Nambiar2
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Background:
Right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) provides a key remodeling index alterable by pulmonary hypertension. Although echocardiography commonly integrates linear wall thickness and chamber dimensions to quantify left ventricular remodeling, the utility of an equivalent right ventricular (RV)-based approach is unknown.
Methods:
This was a retrospective analysis of 200 patients undergoing transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) within 30 days (median = 3 days; interquartile range, 15 days), stratified by echocardiography-quantified pulmonary artery systolic pressure (<35, 35 to <55, 55 to <75, or ≥75 mm Hg). Echocardiographic assessment included RV linear dimensions in parasternal long-axis and apical four-chamber views and wall thicknesses in parasternal long-axis, four-chamber, and subcostal views. Subcostal wall thickness was integrated with chamber diameters to calculate RV mass, which was tested in relation to CMR-quantified RV mass and all-cause mortality.
Results:
Echocardiography-based quantification of all linear dimensions was feasible in 95% of patients (190 of 200). RV wall thicknesses in all orientations increased in relation to pulmonary artery systolic pressure (P < .001) and was greater among patients with, versus those without, CMR-evidenced RVH (P < .001 for all). Correlations between echocardiography and CMR were greatest for RV basal diameter (r = 0.73), RV subcostal wall thickness (r = 0.71), and global RV mass (r = 0.82; P < .001 for all). Echocardiography-derived global RV mass cutoffs were established in a derivation cohort and tested in a validation cohort. Results demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity (75.5% and 74.0%, respectively) in relation to CMR-quantified RVH. During follow-up (median, 4.2 years), 18% of patients (n = 36) died. Echocardiography-evidenced RVH (hazard ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.09-3.88; P = .048) conferred similar mortality risk compared with RVH on CMR (hazard ratio, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.22-4.78; P = .01).
Conclusions:
Echocardiography-quantified RV parameters provide a robust index of RV afterload. Global RV mass calculated using a novel echocardiographic formula based on readily available linear indices yields good diagnostic performance for CMR-evidenced RVH and confers increased mortality risk.
