Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 13, 2025

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Effectiveness of Modified HEART Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events
Sultan Tuna Akgol Gur1, Meryem Betos Kocak2, Abdullah Osman Kocak1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.
Insights
The modified HEART (mHEART) score, incorporating visual analog scale (VAS) pain severity, better identifies patients at low risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) than the standard HEART score. This improves chest pain assessment in emergency settings.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Cardiology
- Clinical Decision Support
Background:
- Chest pain is a common emergency department presentation requiring accurate risk stratification.
- Existing scoring systems, like the HEART score, aid in decision-making but can be improved.
- Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain severity is a readily available patient-reported outcome.
Purpose of the Study:
- To modify the HEART score by incorporating the VAS pain severity.
- To evaluate the performance of the modified HEART (mHEART) score in predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 293 patients presenting with chest pain.
- Calculation of HEART score and a modified HEART (mHEART) score, adding a point for VAS ≥7.
- Comparison of mHEART and HEART scores for predicting MACE within 30 days.
Main Results:
- The mHEART score demonstrated improved predictive accuracy compared to the HEART score.
- Fewer patients incorrectly classified as low-risk for MACE using the mHEART score (1/246) versus the HEART score (6/251).
- 26.3% of patients had VAS scores ≥7, indicating significant pain severity in a notable subgroup.
Conclusions:
- Incorporating VAS pain severity into the HEART score enhances its ability to identify low-risk chest pain patients.
- The mHEART score offers a more refined tool for emergency physicians managing chest pain presentations.
- Further validation studies are recommended to support the clinical adoption of the mHEART score.
Objective:
The most important problem for emergency physicians in patients presenting with chest pain is deciding whether to discharge the patient or not. Therefore, many scoring systems have been developed to help with this decision making process. We aim to achieve a modified HEART value by combining the VAS value with the HEART score.
Materials And Methods:
Data were collected on age, sex, duration of the symptoms, pain severity using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), and the presence of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE). The HEART score was calculated and modified (mHEART) by adding 1 point to the total HEART score for a VAS score of ≥7.
Results:
During the study period, 4781 patients were admitted, and 293 participants were analyzed. Of the patients, 34(11.6%) experienced MACE within a month after the encounter. The mean VAS scores were 5.65±1.44. However, 77(26.3%) patients had VAS scores ≥7. Taking 3 as the threshold, 42(14.3%) patients had HEART scores of 4 and above, where 47(16.0%) had mHEART scores ≥4. The mHEART scoring demonstrated better test indicators than the HEART score. According to the HEART score, 6(2.3%) of the 251 patients predicted as negative would develop MACE, but this number decreased to 1(0.4%) in 246 using the mHEART score.
Conclusion:
Although the HEART score performs reasonably well in discriminating patients who are MACE negative, it is possible to further improve the score by adding the VAS item. After validation by other studies, we would suggest modifying the HEART score by including the VAS item.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

