Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Trial and Error and Algorithm01:12

Trial and Error and Algorithm

255
A problem-solving strategy is a plan of action used to find a solution. Different strategies have distinct action plans. Trial and error involves trying different solutions until one works. For instance, to fix a broken printer, you might check ink levels, ensure the paper tray isn't jammed, and verify the printer's connection to your laptop. This method can be time-consuming but is commonly used. Thomas Edison, for example, used trial and error to find a suitable filament for the light...
255
Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

278
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
278
Problem-Solving01:29

Problem-Solving

340
Effective problem-solving consists of two steps: 1. identifying the problem and 2. selecting the appropriate problem-solving strategy (i.e., a plan of action used to find a solution). Humans use four problem-solving strategies:
340
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

51
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
51
Information Processing Approach01:30

Information Processing Approach

286
The information-processing theory of cognitive development centers on fundamental mental processes, including attention, memory, and problem-solving skills. Researchers in this field examine how cognitive abilities, such as working memory, evolve and influence children's overall development. Studies indicate that children with stronger working memory tend to excel in reading comprehension, math, and problem-solving compared to peers with less efficient memory skills. Low working memory is...
286
Principle of Moments: Problem Solving01:30

Principle of Moments: Problem Solving

1.1K
The principle of moments is a fundamental concept in physics and engineering. It refers to the balancing of forces and moments around a point or axis, also known as the pivot. This principle is used in many real-life scenarios, including construction, sports, and daily activities like opening doors and pushing objects.
One such scenario involves a pole placed in a three-dimensional system with a cable attached. When a tension is applied to the cable, the moment about the z-axis passing through...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inconclusive decisions and error rates in forensic science.

Forensic science international. Synergy·2024
Same author

Registered reports in forensic science.

Royal Society open science·2022
Same author

Machine learning algorithms in forensic science: A response to Morrison et al. (2022).

Forensic science international. Synergy·2022
Same author

Probabilistic reporting and algorithms in forensic science: Stakeholder perspectives within the American criminal justice system.

Forensic science international. Synergy·2022
Same author

A method for measuring the quality of friction skin impression evidence: Method development and validation.

Forensic science international·2021
Same author

Reply to Morrison et al. (2016) Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2017
Same journal

European exonerations: Factors and frequencies of wrongful convictions in Europe.

Forensic science international. Synergy·2026
Same journal

Detection and characterization of explosives and explosives residues: a review 2022-2025.

Forensic science international. Synergy·2026
Same journal

Explainable deep learning in bloodstain pattern analysis: A pilot study using convolutional neural networks with saliency maps.

Forensic science international. Synergy·2026
Same journal

Sally Clark: Trial and error by Judge and Jury.

Forensic science international. Synergy·2026
Same journal

Investigating interdisciplinary learning outcomes in a forensic science programme.

Forensic science international. Synergy·2026
Same journal

Interpol review of forensic paint, tape, and glass evidence 2022-2025.

Forensic science international. Synergy·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 13, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.4K

Implementation of algorithms in pattern & impression evidence: A responsible and practical roadmap.

H Swofford1, C Champod1

  • 1School of Criminal Justice, Forensic Science Institute, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.

Forensic Science International. Synergy
|March 15, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Forensic science practitioners resist using algorithms due to concerns about human-algorithm interaction and legal admissibility. This study proposes a practical strategy to overcome these barriers for responsible implementation.

Keywords:
AlgorithmsAutomationForensic scienceModelsPattern evidenceStatistics

More Related Videos

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

12.0K
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 13, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.4K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

12.0K
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.2K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Legal Technology
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Scholars advocate for algorithmic tools in forensic science to enhance objectivity in expert conclusions.
  • Forensic practitioners show reluctance towards adopting algorithmic interventions, preferring traditional expertise.
  • Resistance stems from concerns regarding human-algorithm interaction and legal system integration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the reasons behind forensic practitioners' opposition to algorithmic tools.
  • To explore strategies for overcoming practitioners' concerns regarding algorithmic implementation.
  • To propose a practical and responsible approach for integrating algorithms into forensic science.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of human-algorithm interaction issues in real-world and laboratory settings.
  • Examination of legal challenges and admissibility concerns for algorithms in the justice system.
  • Literature review of existing algorithmic approaches and practitioner feedback.

Main Results:

  • Practitioner skepticism towards algorithms is rooted in practical usability and legal validation challenges.
  • Understanding human-algorithm dynamics is crucial for acceptance.
  • Legal system's handling of algorithmic evidence significantly impacts adoption.

Conclusions:

  • A nuanced strategy is needed to address practitioners' concerns for successful algorithmic integration.
  • Focusing on responsible and practical implementation can bridge the gap between technology and forensic practice.
  • Addressing legal and human factors is key to realizing the empirical potential of algorithms in forensic science.