Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

933
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
933
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

379
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
379
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

8.6K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
8.6K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

419
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
419
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity01:25

Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity

9.1K
Drugs exert their therapeutic effects by interacting with receptors, enzymes, or ion channels that are present throughout the human body. The strength and duration of the interaction between a drug and its target receptor are characterized by the selectivity and specificity of the drug. Selectivity refers to a drug's strong preference for its intended target over other targets. For instance, isoprenaline, a non-selective β-adrenergic agonist, interacts with both β1- and...
9.1K
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

13.3K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
13.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of time-lapse monitoring with or without the use of embryo selection software compared to routine incubation and selection.

Human reproduction open·2026
Same author

EFLM position statement on the proposed 2025/0404(COD) IVDR Amendment of Article 5.5.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Considering research waste in economic evaluations of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
Same author

Frameworks of Health Outcomes for Performance Specifications in Laboratory Medicine.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same author

QUADAS-3 Explanation and Elaboration: Guidance for Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

QUADAS-3: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies.

Annals of internal medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Application of Biochip Microfluidic Technology to Detect Serum Allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E sIgE
07:10

Application of Biochip Microfluidic Technology to Detect Serum Allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E sIgE

Published on: April 21, 2019

16.7K

On the Origin of Sensitivity and Specificity.

Nicholas Binney1, Christopher Hyde2, Patrick M Bossuyt3

  • 1Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.B.).

Annals of Internal Medicine
|March 15, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity concepts originated in early 20th-century immunology, not 1947. These measures evolved from immunologic concepts tied to infectious disease assumptions.

More Related Videos

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

641
Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions
07:46

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Published on: April 20, 2016

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Application of Biochip Microfluidic Technology to Detect Serum Allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E sIgE
07:10

Application of Biochip Microfluidic Technology to Detect Serum Allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E sIgE

Published on: April 21, 2019

16.7K
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

641
Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions
07:46

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Published on: April 20, 2016

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical History
  • Immunology
  • Diagnostic Test Evaluation

Background:

  • The concepts of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity are widely attributed to Jacob Yerushalmy in 1947.
  • However, the assessment of these measures predates this widely accepted origin.

Observation:

  • Sensitivity and specificity share origins with the development of serology and were initially immunologic concepts.
  • These concepts were closely linked to the evolution of complement fixation reactions, particularly for syphilis diagnosis.

Findings:

  • The study traces the transformation of immunologic sensitivity and specificity into their modern diagnostic counterparts.
  • Relocating the origins to the early 1900s reveals their entanglement with prevailing assumptions about specific infectious disease entities.

Implications:

  • Revisiting the origins of sensitivity and specificity provides a more accurate historical context for their development.
  • Understanding this evolution highlights the influence of early 20th-century infectious disease paradigms on diagnostic test evaluation.