Chicago classification version 4.0© technical review: Update on standard high-resolution manometry protocol for the

Mark R Fox1, Rami Sweis2, Rena Yadlapati3

  • 1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Insights

The Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) enhances esophageal motility disorder diagnosis using high-resolution manometry (HRM) with expanded testing protocols. This updated scheme aims for more precise diagnoses and standardized global procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Esophageal Physiology
  • Diagnostic Technology

Background:

  • The Chicago Classification (CC) provides a standardized framework for diagnosing esophageal motility disorders.
  • Previous versions of CC had limitations leading to ambiguous or inconclusive high-resolution manometry (HRM) diagnoses.
  • Advancements in HRM technology necessitate updated diagnostic criteria.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To detail the updated Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) for esophageal motility disorders.
  • To describe the expanded HRM protocol, including provocative testing, for improved diagnostic accuracy.
  • To establish a standardized global manometry protocol for consistency and research.

Main Methods:

  • Incorporation of single wet swallows in supine and upright positions.
  • Inclusion of provocative testing: multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge.
  • Utilization of solid bolus swallows, solid test meals, and pharmacologic provocation.

Main Results:

  • CCv4.0 employs a more rigorous and expansive HRM protocol.
  • Provocative tests enhance diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for esophageal motility disorders.
  • The updated classification aims to minimize ambiguity and reduce inconclusive HRM diagnoses.

Conclusions:

  • CCv4.0 provides a refined diagnostic scheme for esophageal motility disorders.
  • The expanded protocol and provocative testing improve diagnostic yield and therapeutic guidance.
  • Standardization of HRM protocols facilitates procedural consistency, diagnostic reliability, and collaborative research.