Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sample Size Calculation01:19

Sample Size Calculation

5.4K
Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
5.4K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

249
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
249
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.5K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.5K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

9.7K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
9.7K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.4K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.4K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

9.2K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
9.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficient randomized adaptive designs for multi-arm clinical trials.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025
Same author

Statistical inference on the relative risk following covariate-adaptive randomization.

Biometrics·2025
Same author

Response-Adaptive Randomization Procedure in Clinical Trials with Surrogate Endpoints.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same author

Group Response-Adaptive Randomization With Delayed and Missing Responses.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same author

Robustness of response-adaptive randomization.

Biometrics·2024
Same author

Response-adaptive treatment randomization for multiple comparisons of treatments with recurrent event responses.

Statistical methods in medical research·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.9K

Sample size re-estimation for covariate-adaptive randomized clinical trials.

Xin Li1, Wei Ma2, Feifang Hu1

  • 1Department of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|March 18, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a framework for combining covariate-adaptive randomization (CAR) with sample size re-estimation (SSR) in clinical trials. The research provides adjusted statistical methods to maintain trial integrity and improve power while optimizing sample size.

Keywords:
early terminationefficiencyinferenceinterim analysistype I error rate

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

874
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.9K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

874
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Covariate-adaptive randomization (CAR) improves statistical efficiency and credibility in clinical trials.
  • Sample size re-estimation (SSR) is a valuable technique for optimizing trial duration and cost.
  • Combining CAR and SSR is increasingly popular but lacks theoretical investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a theoretical framework for applying SSR in CAR trials.
  • To address statistical inference adjustments needed when covariates are omitted.
  • To provide an adjusted test statistic and sample size calculation formula for CAR settings.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a framework for integrating SSR within CAR trial designs.
  • Derived an adjusted test statistic to maintain type I error rates.
  • Proved asymptotic independence between trial stages under CAR.
  • Conducted numerical studies across various practical scenarios.

Main Results:

  • The proposed methods preserve and enhance the advantages of both CAR and SSR.
  • Improved statistical power and optimized sample size were demonstrated.
  • The adjusted methods effectively handle the complexities of adaptive randomization.

Conclusions:

  • The framework provides a robust approach for combining CAR and SSR in clinical trials.
  • The derived methods ensure statistical validity and efficiency.
  • This research offers practical solutions for optimizing clinical trial design and resource allocation.