Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Neuro-rehabilitation Approach for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Published on: January 25, 2016
Cut-off score of the Khalfa Hyperacusis Questionnaire with 10 selected items
Hiroyuki Yamada1,2, Toru Ishikawa1, Naoki Oishi1
1Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Objective:
In the management of hyperacusis, the hyperacusis questionnaire (HQ) is a frequently used measure. It is comprised of 14 items, with a total score of 42 points. We have developed the Japanese version of the HQ, but the validity of the factors has not been considered. This study was performed to re-evaluate the HQ to confirm its validity and reliability.
Design:
Exploratory factor analysis was performed and we removed the problematic items with low factor loadings and re-evaluated the reliability and validity.
Study Sample:
Patients with hyperacusis (n = 109) were included. Hyperacusis was confirmed based on the patients' complaint of "intolerance to sound". Patients without hyperacusis but with tinnitus and/or hearing loss (n = 103) were also included.
Results:
Items 1, 5, 6, and 11 had low factor loadings; therefore, we removed these four items. The HQ with 10 items had high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.926). The mean total scores for the patients with and without hyperacusis were 16.3 and 4.0, respectively; the inter-group difference was statistically significant. We found the best score that maximised sensitivity and specificity was 8.
Conclusions:
The HQ with 10 items, up to 30 points and a cut-off score of 8 is appropriate for classifying hyperacusis.
More Related Videos
06:04Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025