Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
Myocardial stress perfusion scintigraphy for outcome prediction in patients with severe left ventricular systolic
Alessia Gimelli1, Alberto Aimo2,3, Emilio Maria Pasanisi2
1Fondazione Toscana G. Monasterio, Pisa, Italy. gimelli@ftgm.it.
Insights
Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy scores (SRS and SSS) are less predictive for cardiac events in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. However, these scores still offer independent prognostic value for predicting outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nuclear Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Imaging
Background:
- Coronary angiography is recommended for suspected chronic coronary syndrome with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%.
- The predictive role of ischemia testing, such as stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), for risk stratification in these patients is not well-defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic value of stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
- To assess the predictive capability of summed rest score (SRS) and summed stress score (SSS) for cardiovascular outcomes in patients stratified by LVEF.
Main Methods:
- 1576 patients undergoing MPS were retrospectively analyzed.
- Patients were categorized into three LVEF groups: ≤35%, 36-49%, and ≥50%.
- Cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause death, and late revascularization were recorded as endpoints.
Main Results:
- Patients with LVEF ≤35% exhibited higher rates of cardiovascular events and mortality compared to other groups.
- Summed rest score (SRS), summed stress score (SSS), and summed difference score (SDS) showed limited predictive accuracy for major adverse cardiovascular events in the LVEF ≤35% subgroup.
- Despite lower predictive accuracy, SRS and SSS cut-offs retained independent prognostic significance in multivariable models including coronary artery disease severity and prior revascularization.
Conclusions:
- In patients with LVEF ≤35%, SRS and SSS are less predictive of outcomes compared to patients with better preserved systolic function.
- However, the prognostic information derived from SRS and SSS cut-offs remains significant and independent of coronary artery disease burden and early revascularization in this high-risk population.
Abstract:
Coronary angiography has been recommended in all patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. The role of ischemia testing, for example, through stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), for risk prediction is not well established.
Methods:
We evaluated 1576 consecutive patients referred to MPS and stratified into 3 LV ejection fraction (LVEF) categories: ≤35%, 36-49%, and ≥ 50%.
Results:
Patients with LVEF ≤35% were oldest, most often men, and with the highest likelihood of prior early (elective or urgent) coronary revascularization. They had also the highest values or summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score (SRS), and summed difference score (SDS), as well as the highest frequency of significant coronary artery disease, and a greater number of diseased vessels.
Follow-Up:
In this subgroup, 32 cardiovascular death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) (21%), 35 all-cause deaths (22%), and 37 cardiovascular deaths, non-fatal MI, or late revascularizations (27%) were recorded with the shortest survival among all LVEF classes. SRS, SSS, and SDS had very low area under the curve values for the prediction of the 3 endpoints, with very high cut-offs, respectively. SRS and SSS cut-offs predicted a worse outcome in Cox regression models including the number of diseased vessels and early revascularization.
Conclusions:
In patients with LVEF ≤35%, SRS and SSS are less predictive of outcome than in patients with better preserved systolic dysfunction, but their cut-offs retain independent prognostic significance from the number of vessels with significant stenoses and from early revascularization.
More Related Videos
08:13In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
08:19Transthoracic Echocardiography to Assess Post-Resuscitation Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest in Pigs
Published on: July 12, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Exercise Stress Test
Exercise stress testing, commonly known as a treadmill test, is a noninvasive procedure used to evaluate cardiovascular function and diagnose heart conditions.
Definition
An exercise stress test measures the heart's response to exertion using a treadmill or stationary bicycle. Chest electrodes record the heart's electrical activity through an ECG, and blood pressure is monitored regularly.
Purposes
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy