Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 12, 2025
DIPLOMA Approach for Standardized Pathology Assessment of Distal Pancreatectomy Specimens
Published on: February 1, 2020
Peritumoral lymph nodes in pancreatic cancer revisited; is it truly equivalent to lymph node metastasis?
Yoonhyeong Byun1, Kyoung-Bun Lee2, Jin-Young Jang1
1Division of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Background:
Lymph node (LN) metastasis is a well-known poor prognostic factor of pancreatic cancer. LN metastasis, through direct invasion of tumor cell to peritumoral lymph nodes (PTLN), is treated as the same as those which spread through lymphatic channels. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of PTLN invasion on the oncologic outcome of pancreatic cancer.
Methods:
Five hundred and six patients who underwent operation for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from 2012 to 2018 were reviewed. PTLN invasion was defined as direct invasion of tumor cells in contact with main tumor.
Results:
Among the 506 patients, 112 patients (22.1%) had PTLN invasion. PTLN invasion group (PTLNI) showed better disease-free survival than regional LN metastasis group (RLNM) and combined LN metastasis group (CLNM) (PTLNI 21 vs RLNM 11 vs CLNM 12 months, P = .003). There was no significant difference between N0 and PTLNI (PTLNI 21 vs N0 23 months, P = .999). In multivariate analysis, conventional LN metastasis was a significant factor compared to N0, but PTLN invasion was not (hazard ratio 0.786 [0.507-1.220], P = .283).
Conclusion:
Because PTLN invasion does not adversely affect survival in the same way as LN metastasis does, pancreatic cancer-may be overstaged if PTLN invasion were dealt in the same manner as a metastatic LN. Therefore, PTLN invasion should be disregarded from current nodal staging system.
