Comparison of simulation observer tools on engagement and maximising learning: a pilot study

Area of Science:

• Nursing Education
• Clinical Simulation
• Healthcare Professional Training

Background:

• Assessing nursing students' clinical reasoning is crucial for patient safety.
• Simulation-based learning offers a safe environment for developing clinical reasoning skills.
• Standardized tools are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of simulation in nursing education.

Purpose of the Study:

• To compare the Clinical Reasoning Observer Worksheet (CROW) with a standard worksheet.
• To evaluate the impact on nursing students' active learning behaviors and perceived clinical reasoning.
• To test the feasibility of study design and instrumentation for future research.

Main Methods:

• Pilot study design involving nursing students using simulation.
• Comparison of two observer worksheets: CROW and a standard version.
• Assessment of active learning behaviors and self-perceived clinical reasoning ability.

Main Results:

• No significant overall difference in outcomes between the two observer worksheets.
• Participants in both groups reported increased perceived ability to apply clinical reasoning.
• Preliminary evidence on recruitment and instrumentation efficacy was gathered.

Conclusions:

• Modifications to instrumentation, survey delivery, and facilitator training are needed for larger studies.
• A larger, main study with suggested improvements is required for definitive evaluation.
• Both worksheets demonstrated a positive impact on students' perceived clinical reasoning.