Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 12, 2025

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
Published on: February 21, 2011
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Voice: An Updated Readability Analysis
Julia Stefu1, Bonnie K Slavych2, Richard I Zraick1
1University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
Most voice-related patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are written above a sixth-grade reading level, despite health literacy recommendations. This study analyzed eight PROMs to assess their readability and adherence to health literacy standards.
Area of Science:
- Health Literacy
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
- Voice Disorders
Background:
- Health literacy experts recommend patient-facing materials be written at a fifth-to-sixth grade reading level.
- Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are crucial for assessing patient experiences and treatment effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate whether voice-related PROMs developed since 2011 meet the recommended fifth-to-sixth grade reading level.
- To assess the current state of health literacy in voice-related patient outcome instruments.
Main Methods:
- A readability analysis was performed on eight voice-related PROMs.
- Multiple established readability formulas were used, including Coleman-Liau, Flesch-Kincaid, FORCAST, Gunning-Fog, and SMOG.
Main Results:
- A significant majority (75%) of the analyzed voice-related PROMs exceeded the recommended fifth-to-sixth grade reading level.
- The readability assessment indicated a gap between expert recommendations and the actual reading level of these patient-facing tools.
Conclusions:
- Despite increased awareness of health literacy, voice-related PROMs are often created without adequate consideration for reading level.
- There is a need for researchers to revise existing PROMs and develop new ones with improved readability, alongside other enhancing features.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract IV: Auscultation
Breath Sounds
Breath sounds are categorized into vesicular, bronchovesicular, and bronchial.
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Pulmonary Function Tests
Pulmonary Function Tests are crucial diagnostic tools for assessing respiratory function, particularly in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. They comprehensively evaluate lung volumes, ventilatory function, breathing mechanics, diffusion, and gas exchange. These tests help diagnose pulmonary diseases and play a significant role in monitoring disease progression, evaluating disability, and assessing response to therapy.
PFTs involve using a spirometer, a...
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...

