Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

143
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
143
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.5K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.5K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

213
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
213
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

249
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
249
Epistasis Analysis01:09

Epistasis Analysis

5.4K
Although Mendel chose seven unrelated traits in peas to study gene segregation, most traits involve multiple gene interactions that create a spectrum of phenotypes. When the interaction of various genes or alleles at different locations influences a phenotype, this is called epistasis. Epistasis often involves one gene masking or interfering with the expression of another (antagonistic epistasis). Epistasis often occurs when different genes are part of the same biochemical pathway. The...
5.4K
Chi-square Analysis02:46

Chi-square Analysis

41.4K
The chi-square test is a statistical hypothesis test. It is used to check whether there is a significant difference between an expected value and an observed value. In the context of genetics, it enables us to either accept or reject a hypothesis, based on how much the observed values deviate from the expected values.
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
41.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Glycemic response trajectories on metformin monotherapy in real-world diabetes care.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Robust ranking of renewable energy alternatives handling uncertainty using novel hesitant bi-fuzzy MEREC-MOORA and Dombi aggregation approach.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

The Impact of Social Vulnerability on Exercise Outcomes: A Longitudinal Study of Physical Function in Older People With HIV.

Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care·2026
Same author

Special issue: cell and gene causal inference in the design and analysis of gene therapy clinical trials.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

Mapping the last mile: Micro-stratification for sustained visceral leishmaniasis elimination in Bangladesh.

PLoS neglected tropical diseases·2026
Same author

The effects of high-intensity interval training versus continuous moderate-intensity exercise on body composition among older adults with HIV.

The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences·2026
Same journal

Design of Trials with Composite Endpoints with the R Package CompAREdesign.

Statistics in biosciences·2026
Same journal

Pan-Cancer Drug Response Prediction Using Integrative Principal Component Regression.

Statistics in biosciences·2026
Same journal

Variance Estimation for Weighted Average Treatment Effects.

Statistics in biosciences·2026
Same journal

Bayesian Modeling on Microbiome Data Analysis: Application to Subgingival Microbiome Study.

Statistics in biosciences·2026
Same journal

Canopy2: Tumor Phylogeny Inference by Bulk DNA and Single-Cell RNA Sequencing.

Statistics in biosciences·2026
Same journal

Multilevel Multivariate Functional Principal Component Analysis of Evoked and Induced Event-Related Spectral Perturbations.

Statistics in biosciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
08:58

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

173

A general approach to sensitivity analysis for Mendelian randomization.

Weiming Zhang1, Debashis Ghosh1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, U.S.A.

Statistics in Biosciences
|March 19, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mendelian Randomization (MR) studies need sensitivity analysis due to hard-to-verify assumptions. This new method offers a general approach to evaluate MR results, improving bias correction and conclusion validity.

Keywords:
causal inferenceinstrumental variablesensitivity analysisunmeasured confounding

More Related Videos

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.2K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
08:58

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

173
Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.2K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.4K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Genetic Epidemiology

Background:

  • Mendelian Randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to estimate exposure-outcome effects, accounting for unmeasured confounders.
  • The validity of MR relies on three critical, often unverifiable, assumptions.
  • Sensitivity analysis is crucial for assessing the robustness of MR findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a general and user-friendly method for conducting sensitivity analysis in Mendelian Randomization studies.
  • To derive a novel sensitivity analysis formula based on the asymptotic bias of instrumental variable estimators.
  • To provide tools for bias correction and informed conclusion-making in MR research.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a new sensitivity analysis formula incorporating parameters like instrument-confounder correlation, direct instrument effects, and instrument strength.
  • Conducted simulation studies using individual SNPs and allele scores as instruments across various scenarios.
  • Applied the proposed method to a published bone mineral density dataset.

Main Results:

  • The proposed sensitivity analysis method was evaluated in diverse simulation settings.
  • Demonstrated the practical utility of the method using a real-world bone mineral density study dataset.
  • The approach allows for bias correction and enhances the scientific plausibility of MR findings.

Conclusions:

  • The developed sensitivity analysis method is a valuable and accessible tool for Mendelian Randomization studies.
  • Integrating this method with domain expertise enables researchers to obtain bias-corrected results.
  • The approach facilitates more informed and scientifically plausible conclusions in MR research.