Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.3K
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development01:19

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

400
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
400
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

30.3K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
30.3K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.7K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.2K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.2K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

41.7K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
41.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficient expression of full-length triple-helix recombinant type III collagen in <i>Pichia pastoris</i>.

Synthetic and systems biotechnology·2026
Same author

Phase unwrapping in digital holographic interferometry via physics-informed convolutional-Fourier neural network.

Optics express·2026
Same author

Screening the optimal rTSMS frequency to orchestrate immune-fibrotic remodeling for adult spinal cord repair.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same author

HyperDC: A Non-Uniform Hypergraph Framework for Dual- and Higher-Order Drug Combination Recommendation Across Diverse Complex Diseases.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Solvent-Mediated Structural Tuning of Eu-MOFs for the <i>N</i>-Formylation of Amines with CO<sub>2</sub>.

Inorganic chemistry·2026
Same author

HIF-1α-mediated mitochondrial autophagy in the post-treatment protective effect of thyroxine against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Journal of cardiothoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

When criterion control in face matching induces correlation: Commentary on Baker et al. (2026).

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Productivity matters for the neural processing of novel words, but not existing ones" Cognition Volume 274 (2026) 106593.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Investigating the origins of partisanship: What motivates children to preferentially endorse their ingroups' claims?

Cognition·2026
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 12, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

927

How peer influence shapes value computation in moral decision-making.

Hongbo Yu1, Jenifer Z Siegel1, John A Clithero2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Cognition
|March 19, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Peer influence shapes moral behavior by altering the perceived value of choices to align with others' goals. This study reveals how observing peers' moral decisions impacts individual preferences and decision-making processes.

Keywords:
Bayesian hierarchical modelingDrift diffusion modelGoalMoral decision-makingSocial influence

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.9K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 12, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

927
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.9K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Moral behavior is known to be influenced by social factors, particularly peer interactions.
  • Understanding the mechanisms of peer influence on moral decision-making is crucial for social and developmental psychology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how information from peers influences individual moral preferences.
  • To determine if peer influence alters the value computation of moral choices based on peers' inferred goals.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized drift-diffusion modeling to analyze decision-making processes.
  • Conducted two studies involving participants observing and making moral decisions after exposure to prosocial or antisocial peer behavior.

Main Results:

  • Participants accurately inferred peer goals from observed moral decisions.
  • Exposure to peer moral decisions shifted participants' own preferences to align with those of the observed peers.
  • Peer influence affected value computation by increasing the weight of choice attributes aligned with peer goals, independent of initial choice bias.

Conclusions:

  • Peer influence significantly alters the subjective value assigned to different choice attributes in moral decision-making.
  • Findings suggest mechanisms for both promoting prosocial and mitigating antisocial peer influence on moral behavior.