Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Extraction of Lignin with High β-O-4 Content by Mild Ethanol Extraction and Its Effect on the Depolymerization Yield
Published on: January 7, 2019
Responsiveness of Aromatoleum aromaticum EbN1T to Lignin-Derived Phenylpropanoids
Jannes Vagts1, Kristin Kalvelage1, Arne Weiten1
1General and Molecular Microbiology, Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Abstract:
The betaproteobacterial degradation specialist Aromatoleum aromaticum EbN1T utilizes several plant-derived 3-phenylpropanoids coupled to denitrification. In vivo responsiveness of A. aromaticum EbN1T was studied by exposing nonadapted cells to distinct pulses (spanning 100 µM to 0.1 nM) of 3-phenylpropanoate, cinnamate, 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propanoate, or p-coumarate. Time-resolved, targeted transcript analyses via quantitative reverse transcription-PCR of four selected 3-phenylpropanoid genes revealed a response threshold of 30 to 50 nM for p-coumarate and 1 to 10 nM for the other three tested 3-phenylpropanoids. At these concentrations, transmembrane effector equilibration is attained by passive diffusion rather than active uptake via the ABC transporter, presumably serving the studied 3-phenylpropanoids as well as benzoate. Highly substrate-specific enzyme formation (EbA5316 to EbA5321 [EbA5316-21]) for the shared peripheral degradation pathway putatively involves the predicted TetR-type transcriptional repressor PprR. Accordingly, relative transcript abundances of ebA5316-21 are lower in succinate- and benzoate-grown wild-type cells than in an unmarked in-frame ΔpprR mutant. In trans-complementation of pprR into the ΔpprR background restored wild-type-like transcript levels. When adapted to p-coumarate, the three genotypes had relative transcript abundances similar to those of ebA5316-21 despite a significantly longer lag phase of the pprR-complemented mutant (∼100-fold higher pprR transcript level than the wild type). Notably, transcript levels of ebA5316-21 were ∼10- to 100-fold higher in p-coumarate- than succinate- or benzoate-adapted cells across all three genotypes. This indicates the additional involvement of an unknown transcriptional regulator. Furthermore, physiological, transcriptional, and (aromatic) acyl-coenzyme A ester intermediate analyses of the wild type and ΔpprR mutant grown with binary substrate mixtures suggest a mode of catabolite repression of superior order to PprR.IMPORTANCE Lignin is a ubiquitous heterobiopolymer built from a suite of 3-phenylpropanoid subunits. It accounts for more than 30% of the global plant dry material, and lignin-related compounds are increasingly released into the environment from anthropogenic sources, i.e., by wastewater effluents from the paper and pulp industry. Hence, following biological or industrial decomplexation of lignin, vast amounts of structurally diverse 3-phenylpropanoids enter terrestrial and aquatic habitats, where they serve as substrates for microbial degradation. This raises the question of what signaling systems environmental bacteria employ to detect these nutritionally attractive compounds and to adjust their catabolism accordingly. Moreover, determining in vivo response thresholds of an anaerobic degradation specialist such as A. aromaticum EbN1T for these aromatic compounds provides insights into the environmental fate of the latter, i.e., when they could escape biodegradation due to too low ambient concentrations.
Related Concept Videos
Aromatic Compounds: Overview
In 1825, Faraday isolated...
Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of...
Cell Signaling in Plants
NMR Spectroscopy of Aromatic Compounds
ortho–para-Directing Activators: –CH3, –OH, –⁠NH2, –OCH3
Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution: Overview

