Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 12, 2025

10:20
Assembly and Purification of Prototype Foamy Virus Intasomes
Published on: March 19, 2018
5.7K
Retroviral prototype foamy virus intasome binding to a nucleosome target does not determine integration efficiency
Randi M Kotlar1, Nathan D Jones2, Gayan Senavirathne2
1Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
The Journal of Biological Chemistry
|March 21, 2021
Summary
Prototype foamy virus (PFV) integrase (IN) outer subunit domains do not impact integration efficiency. However, carboxyl terminal domains (CTDs) affect nucleosome binding, suggesting unproductive binding events during viral DNA integration.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Virology
- Structural Biology
Background:
- Retroviral integrase (IN) enzymes must integrate viral DNA into host chromatin.
- Prototype foamy virus (PFV) integrase forms a tetrameric intasome complex with viral DNA.
- The roles of outer subunit domains in PFV intasomes during nucleosome integration are unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the function of amino and carboxyl terminal domains (CTDs) of outer PFV intasome subunits during integration into nucleosomes.
- To determine how nucleosome binding correlates with integration efficiency and site selection.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the 601 nucleosome as a target substrate to assay PFV intasome integration activity and binding.
- Investigated the effects of outer protomer NED, NTD, and CTD domains on integration and binding.
- Assessed the impact of histone tails on intasome binding and integration.
Main Results:
- Outer protomer NED and NTD domains had no significant effect on integration efficiency, site selection, or binding.
- PFV intasome CTDs significantly altered nucleosome binding but had minimal impact on overall integration efficiency.
- Histone tails affected intasome binding but not integration efficiency or site selection.
Conclusions:
- Nucleosome binding does not directly correlate with PFV integration efficiency.
- Most intasome-nucleosome binding events appear to be unproductive for viral DNA integration.
- Outer subunit domains play differential roles in PFV intasome-nucleosome interactions.
Keywords:
enzyme catalysisintegrationnucleosomeprotein–protein interactionprototype foamy virusretrovirusMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Size and Structure of Viral Genomes
365
Viral genomes exhibit remarkable diversity in size, structure, and composition, influencing their replication strategies and interactions with host cells. These genomes consist of either DNA or RNA and may be linear or circular. Additionally, they can be single-stranded or double-stranded, with each configuration affecting how the virus propagates within a host. RNA viruses, for instance, generally have smaller genomes than DNA viruses, a factor that contributes to their high mutation rates and...
365
Retroviruses
13.3K
Retroviruses and retrotransposons both insert copies of their genetic elements into the genome of the host cell. Thus, the viral genes are passed on when the host genome is replicated or translated. A typical retroviral DNA sequence contains 3-4 genes that encode the different proteins required for its structural assembly and function as a molecular parasite. This DNA is transcribed into a single mRNA, which is very similar in structure to conventional mRNAs, i.e., it is capped at the 5’...
13.3K
Retrovirus Life Cycles
48.2K
Retroviruses have a single-stranded RNA genome that undergoes a special form of replication. Once the retrovirus has entered the host cell, an enzyme called reverse transcriptase synthesizes double-stranded DNA from the retroviral RNA genome. This DNA copy of the genome is then integrated into the host’s genome inside the nucleus via an enzyme called integrase. Consequently, the retroviral genome is transcribed into RNA whenever the host’s genome is transcribed, allowing the...
48.2K
LTR Retrotransposons
18.6K
LTR retrotransposons are class I transposable elements with long terminal repeats flanking an internal coding region. These elements are less abundant in mammals compared to other class I transposable elements. About 8 percent of human genomic DNA comprises LTR retrotransposons. Some of the common examples of LTR retrotransposons are Ty elements in yeast and Copia elements in Drosophila.
The internal coding region of LTR retrotransposons and their mechanism of transposition closely resembles a...
The internal coding region of LTR retrotransposons and their mechanism of transposition closely resembles a...
18.6K

