Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 12, 2025

An Oncogenic Hepatocyte-Induced Orthotopic Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Cancer Arising in the Setting of Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis
Published on: September 12, 2019
Regorafenib versus cabozantinb as second-line treatment after sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma:
Andrea Casadei-Gardini1,2, Lorenza Rimassa3,4, Margherita Rimini5
1School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. casadeigardini@gmail.com.
Background:
Recently, three published phase III trials highlighted the superiority of investigational drugs compared to placebo, thus leading to their approval in the second-line setting. We report here a MAIC of second-line MKI options for patients with HCC previously treated with sorafenib using individual real-world data of regorafenib and aggregate data of second-line cabozantinib from the CELESTIAL trial.
Methods:
Data from 278 patients who received regorafenib as second-line therapy after sorafenib failure for unresectable HCC were used as IPD. Data inclusion were adapted to those reported in the CELESTIAL trial in the subset of patients who received sorafenib as the only prior therapy. Survival medians and rates were obtained from Kaplan-Meier curves, and differences between regorafenib and cabozantinib groups were explored through Cox regression adjusted for weights originating from MAIC.
Results:
The median OS of the weighted regorafenib group was 11.1 months (IQR: 5.6-16.4) and 11.3 (IQR: 6.7-22.4) for cabozantinib; HR 0.83 (95%CI 0.62-1.09). The median PFS of the weighted regorafenib group was 3.0 months (IQR: 1.9-4.8) and 5.5 (IQR: 2.3-9.3) for cabozantinib; HR 0.50 (95%CI 0.41-0.62). In the subgroup who received prior sorafenib for < 3 months, the median OS of the regorafenib group was 6.5 months (IQR: 4.7-10.9) and 9.5 months (IQR: 5.9-18.2) for cabozantinib; HR 0.68 (95%CI 0.39-1.16). In the subgroup receiving prior sorafenib for 3 to < 6 months, the median OS of the regorafenib group was 8.0 months (IQR: 4.2-15.2) and 11.5 (IQR: 6.5-23.9) for cabozantinib; HR 0.66 (95%CI 0.42-1.02). In the subgroup receiving prior sorafenib for ≥ 6 months, the median OS of the regorafenib group was 13.4 (IQR: 8.1-46.5) and 12.3 (IQR: 6.6-22.9) for cabozantinib; HR 0.89 (95%CI 0.52-1.51).
Conclusion:
Our results confirmed no differences between regorafenib and cabozantinib in terms of OS. However, in earlier progressors on prior sorafenib a larger benefit might be expected from cabozantinib treatment.
Insights
Regorafenib and cabozantinib show similar overall survival in second-line HCC treatment post-sorafenib. Cabozantinib may offer greater benefit for patients progressing earlier on sorafenib.
Area of Science:
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) research
- Oncology drug efficacy
- Comparative treatment analysis
Background:
- Three phase III trials demonstrated investigational drugs' superiority over placebo for second-line treatment.
- This study performs a Matching Adjusted Indirect Comparison (MAIC) of second-line multi-kinase inhibitors (MKIs) for HCC patients previously treated with sorafenib.
- Utilizes individual real-world data for regorafenib and aggregate data for cabozantinib from the CELESTIAL trial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of regorafenib and cabozantinib as second-line treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after sorafenib failure.
- To analyze survival outcomes using a MAIC approach with real-world data.
Main Methods:
- Individual patient data (IPD) from 278 patients receiving regorafenib post-sorafenib failure for unresectable HCC were analyzed.
- Data inclusion criteria were matched to the CELESTIAL trial's subset of patients with prior sorafenib monotherapy.
- Survival medians and rates were derived from Kaplan-Meier curves; Cox regression adjusted for MAIC weights was used to compare groups.
Main Results:
- Median Overall Survival (OS) was comparable: 11.1 months for regorafenib vs. 11.3 months for cabozantinib (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.62-1.09).
- Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) favored cabozantinib: 3.0 months for regorafenib vs. 5.5 months for cabozantinib (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.41-0.62).
- Subgroup analyses indicated a potential greater OS benefit for cabozantinib in patients with shorter prior sorafenib treatment durations (<6 months).
Conclusions:
- No significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between regorafenib and cabozantinib in the second-line HCC setting after sorafenib.
- Cabozantinib may provide a larger benefit for patients experiencing earlier progression on prior sorafenib therapy.
More Related Videos
09:11Y-90 Radioembolization and PD-1 Inhibitor as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: May 24, 2024
09:38Establishment and Characterization of Three Afatinib-resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma PC-9 Cell Lines Developed with Increasing Doses of Afatinib
Published on: June 26, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...