Regorafenib versus cabozantinb as second-line treatment after sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma:

Andrea Casadei-Gardini1,2, Lorenza Rimassa3,4, Margherita Rimini5

  • 1School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. casadeigardini@gmail.com.

Abstract

Insights

Regorafenib and cabozantinib show similar overall survival in second-line HCC treatment post-sorafenib. Cabozantinib may offer greater benefit for patients progressing earlier on sorafenib.

Area of Science:

  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) research
  • Oncology drug efficacy
  • Comparative treatment analysis

Background:

  • Three phase III trials demonstrated investigational drugs' superiority over placebo for second-line treatment.
  • This study performs a Matching Adjusted Indirect Comparison (MAIC) of second-line multi-kinase inhibitors (MKIs) for HCC patients previously treated with sorafenib.
  • Utilizes individual real-world data for regorafenib and aggregate data for cabozantinib from the CELESTIAL trial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of regorafenib and cabozantinib as second-line treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after sorafenib failure.
  • To analyze survival outcomes using a MAIC approach with real-world data.

Main Methods:

  • Individual patient data (IPD) from 278 patients receiving regorafenib post-sorafenib failure for unresectable HCC were analyzed.
  • Data inclusion criteria were matched to the CELESTIAL trial's subset of patients with prior sorafenib monotherapy.
  • Survival medians and rates were derived from Kaplan-Meier curves; Cox regression adjusted for MAIC weights was used to compare groups.

Main Results:

  • Median Overall Survival (OS) was comparable: 11.1 months for regorafenib vs. 11.3 months for cabozantinib (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.62-1.09).
  • Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) favored cabozantinib: 3.0 months for regorafenib vs. 5.5 months for cabozantinib (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.41-0.62).
  • Subgroup analyses indicated a potential greater OS benefit for cabozantinib in patients with shorter prior sorafenib treatment durations (<6 months).

Conclusions:

  • No significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between regorafenib and cabozantinib in the second-line HCC setting after sorafenib.
  • Cabozantinib may provide a larger benefit for patients experiencing earlier progression on prior sorafenib therapy.