Application of machine learning methods to bridge the gap between non-interventional studies and randomized

Alexandros Sagkriotis1, Usha Chakravarthy2, Ray Griner3

  • 1Novartis Pharma AG, Switzerland.

Abstract

Insights

An algorithm using machine learning can identify patient subgroups in real-world data (RWD) that mirror outcomes from clinical trials for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. This helps bridge the gap between trial findings and clinical practice.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Real-world evidence (RWE) effectiveness for anti-VEGF agents often lags behind randomized clinical trials (RCTs).
  • This discrepancy limits RWE's utility in regulatory and healthcare decision-making.
  • Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treatment outcomes are a key area of concern.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate an algorithm explaining outcome differences between RWE and RCTs in nAMD patients.
  • To identify key factors influencing visual acuity (VA) changes over 12 months in RWE.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a machine learning decision model using ranibizumab RWD from the US.
  • Validated the model on Australian and UK RWD, analyzing 59 variables.
  • Focused on predicting 12-month change in visual acuity.

Main Results:

  • Identified baseline VA <73 ETDRS letters, subretinal fluid, and three loading doses by Day 90 as critical factors.
  • Applying these criteria aligned RWE outcomes with those from RCTs.
  • Demonstrated that specific patient subsets in RWE mirror RCT results.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning can classify RWE cohorts to identify patient subsets matching RCT benefits.
  • This methodology aids in translating clinical trial findings to real-world clinical practice.
  • Enhances the reliability of RWE for nAMD treatment evaluations.