Upgrading to cardiac resynchronisation therapy: Concordance of real-world experience with clinical guidelines
Laura Tan1, Sashiananthan Ganesananthan2, Hani Huzaien1
1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
Insights
Revision to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) improves heart failure (HF) symptoms. Non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, sinus rhythm, and high RV pacing predict better left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement after CRT revision.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Revision to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) can enhance outcomes in patients with existing pacemakers and worsening heart failure (HF).
- Identifying predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement post-CRT revision is crucial for optimizing patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify factors predicting improvement in LVEF within one year following CRT revision in patients with pre-existing pacemakers.
- To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of CRT revision in a cohort of heart failure patients.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study included 146 patients undergoing CRT revision between January 2012 and May 2018.
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured pre-revision and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-upgrade.
- Patient characteristics including rhythm, cardiomyopathy type, and baseline right ventricular (RV) pacing percentage were analyzed.
Main Results:
- 68% of patients showed LVEF improvement at 6 months (mean ΔLVEF +6.7% ±9.6%), sustained at 12 months.
- Patients with sinus rhythm, non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), and ≥40% baseline RV pacing demonstrated significantly greater LVEF improvement compared to their counterparts.
- No significant differences in LVEF improvement were observed based on gender, time since initial implant, or previous device type.
Conclusions:
- Real-world data support current guidelines recommending CRT revision for select heart failure patients.
- Non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, sinus rhythm, and a high percentage of baseline RV pacing are key predictors of positive LVEF response to CRT revision.
- These findings aid in patient selection and management strategies for CRT revision.
Objective:
Revision to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in patients with existing pacemakers with worsening heart failure (HF) can improve symptoms and cardiac function. We identify factors that predict improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) within a year of CRT revision.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective study of 146 consecutive patients (16% female, mean age 73 ± 11 years, mean LVEF 27 ± 8%) undergoing revision to CRT (January 2012 to May 2018) in a single tertiary centre. LVEF was measured pre-revision and 3, 6 and 12 months post-upgrade.
Results:
At 6 months, 68% of patients demonstrated improvement in LVEF (mean ΔLVEF + 6.7% ± 9.6). Compared to patients in atrial fibrillation (AF), patients with sinus rhythm had a greater improvement in LVEF at 6 months (sinus 8.4 ± 10.3% vs. AF 4.2 ± 8.0%, p = 0.02). Compared to ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) had a greater improvement in LVEF at 6 months (NICM 8.4 ± 9.8% vs ICM 4.8 ± 9.2%, p = 0.05). Patients with RV pacing ≥40% at baseline had a greater improvement in LVEF at 6 months (≥40% RV pacing 9.3 ± 10.2 vs. < 40% RV pacing 4.0 ± 7.4%, p = 0.01). All improvements were sustained over 12 months post-revision. There was no significant difference between genders, years between initial implant and revision, or previous device type.
Conclusions:
Our real-world experience supports current guidelines on CRT revision. NICM, ≥40% RV pacing and sinus rhythm are the main predictors of improvement in LVEF in patients who underwent CRT revision.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations


