Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

22.6K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.6K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.6K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.6K
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

921
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
921
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

3.2K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.2K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.4K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.4K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

9.1K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
9.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

THE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF INPATIENT VERSUS SKILLED NURSING FACILITY REHABILITATION USING LINKED ACUTE STROKE REGISTRY DATA.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Infant subcortical brain volumes associated with maternal obesity and diabetes: a large multicohort human study.

BMC medicine·2026
Same author

Structural Equation Modeling of Genetic and Residual Covariance Matrices for Multiple-Trait Evaluation in Beef Cattle.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2026
Same author

Genomes to fields 2024 maize genotype by environment prediction competition.

BMC research notes·2026
Same author

Improving polygenic score prediction for underrepresented groups through transfer learning.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

G2P datasets: a hub for genomic datasets for predictive modeling in plants and animals.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Dynamics of Quantitative Traits in a Steadily Changing Environment.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Functional Landscape of Zebrafish Gonadotropins and Receptors: A Comprehensive Genetic Analysis.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Synergistic actions of Nup43 and Myosin VI drive actin cone assembly during Drosophila spermiogenesis.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Identification of two Cryptococcus neoformans heme transporters involved in Fhb1-mediated nitrosative stress protection in a fission yeast model.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Analysis of a hypomorphic mei-P26 mutation reveals coordination between developmental programming of germ cells and meiotic chromosome dynamics.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Neural and Genetic Mechanisms Regulating Copulation Latency in Male Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.8K

Optimal breeding-value prediction using a sparse selection index.

Marco Lopez-Cruz1, Gustavo de Los Campos2,3,4

  • 1Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

Genetics
|March 22, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Genomic prediction accuracy improves with a new Sparse Selection Index (SSI) method. SSI identifies optimal training subsets for each individual, outperforming traditional G-BLUP in wheat breeding.

Keywords:
GenPredgenomic predictionpenalized regressionprediction accuracyselection indexshared data resources

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.1K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.8K
Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.1K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.4K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Quantitative Genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Genomic prediction uses DNA and phenotypes to estimate genetic values.
  • Accuracy typically increases with sample size in homogeneous populations.
  • Population heterogeneity in allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium can reduce prediction accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel method for genomic prediction that accounts for population heterogeneity.
  • To improve prediction accuracy by tailoring training data selection for each individual.
  • To address the limitations of existing methods that assume a single optimal training set.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed a Sparse Selection Index (SSI) method, integrating selection index principles with sparsity-inducing regression techniques.
  • Controlled index sparsity using a regularization parameter (λ).
  • G-Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (G-BLUP) emerged as a special case (λ=0).

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated SSI methodology using two wheat datasets with phenotypes from 10 environments.
  • SSI achieved significant gains in prediction accuracy (5-10%) compared to G-BLUP.
  • The SSI approach effectively handles heterogeneity in training data for improved genomic predictions.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed SSI method offers a significant advancement in genomic prediction accuracy.
  • SSI provides a flexible framework that adapts to individual-specific prediction needs.
  • This approach has strong implications for plant and animal breeding programs seeking enhanced genetic gain.