Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 11, 2025

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Decision Analysis in SHared decision making for Thromboprophylaxis during Pregnancy (DASH-TOP): a sequential
Brittany Humphries1, Montserrat León-García2,3, Shannon Bates4
1Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
This pilot study explores decision analysis to aid pregnant women with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in choosing between low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or no prophylaxis. Findings will inform shared decision-making for VTE prevention in pregnancy.
Area of Science:
- Medical Decision Making
- Health Outcomes Research
- Pharmacoeconomics
Background:
- Shared decision-making is crucial when evidence is inconclusive and treatment options have balanced risks and benefits.
- Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy presents such a clinical scenario.
- Integrating patient values with clinical evidence is essential for optimal treatment choices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the rationale and methodology of a pilot study applying decision analysis to shared decision-making.
- To explore the use of prophylactic LMWH in pregnant women or those considering pregnancy with a history of VTE.
- To enhance the decision-making process by bridging evidence-based medicine with patient-specific values.
Main Methods:
- An international, mixed-methods, sequential explanatory study design.
- Quantitative phase: Shared decision-making intervention (choice exercise, values elicitation, personalized decision analysis) followed by measurement of decisional conflict, self-efficacy, and satisfaction.
- Qualitative phase: Semi-structured interviews to explore participants' experiences and perceptions of the intervention, followed by integrated meta-inferences.
Main Results:
- The study is designed to collect and analyze quantitative data on decisional conflict, self-efficacy, and satisfaction.
- Qualitative data will explore participants' experiences and perceptions of the shared decision-making intervention.
- Integrated findings will provide meta-inferences to inform future clinical practice and research.
Conclusions:
- Decision analysis offers a quantitative framework to support shared decision-making in complex clinical situations.
- The pilot study will assess the feasibility and impact of a decision-analytic intervention for VTE prophylaxis in pregnancy.
- This approach aims to empower patients by aligning treatment decisions with their unique values and preferences.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...

