Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 11, 2025
Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
Published on: June 14, 2019
Assessing the efficacy of a structured stress management program in reducing stress and climacteric symptoms in peri-
Areti Augoulea1, Anastasia Palaiologou1, Foteini Christidi2
1Menopause Clinic, 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaeio Hospital, 27, Themistokleous street, Dionysos, GR-14578, Athens, Greece.
To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured education program on lifestyle habits, which is also incorporating teaching on deep breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, and guided visualization, in the control of various components of the climacteric symptomatology in peri- and postmenopausal women. Sixty-one women aged 40-65 years with varying climacteric and stress symptoms were included in this study. Women were randomly assigned to the intervention group (31) or the control group (30). The intervention group followed an 8-week stress management program. The following parameters were assessed at baseline and at the end of the 8-week follow-up period in both groups: climacteric symptoms (Green Climacteric Scale (GCS)), sleep quality (Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)), mood status (Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale), self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale), and health-related control (health locus of control (HLC)). A mixed-model ANOVA showed significant time × group × GCS interaction (within subjects: F = 23.830, p value<0.001; between subjects: F = 39.078, p value<0.001). With regard to HLC, there was a non-significant between subjects but a significant within-subjects effect (HLC × group × time, F = 3.848, p value = 0.024). Regarding DASS scores, there was a significant between-subjects' effect (F = 10.258, p value = 0.003) but a non-significant within-subjects' effect. With regard to PSQI, the analysis showed significant within-subjects' effects (PSQI × group × time: F = 4.691, p value = 0.003) and non-significant between-subjects' effects (F = 0.022, p = 0.883). Finally, regarding RSS, there was a significant within-subjects' (RSS × group × time, F = 4.183, p value = 0.029) but non-significant between-subjects' effect (F = 1.582, p value = 0.213). Stress management may offer an alternative approach to the management of climacteric symptoms.
To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured education program on lifestyle habits, which is also incorporating teaching on deep breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, and guided visualization, in the control of various components of the climacteric symptomatology in peri- and postmenopausal women. Sixty-one women aged 40-65 years with varying climacteric and stress symptoms were included in this study. Women were randomly assigned to the intervention group (31) or the control group (30). The intervention group followed an 8-week stress management program. The following parameters were assessed at baseline and at the end of the 8-week follow-up period in both groups: climacteric symptoms (Green Climacteric Scale (GCS)), sleep quality (Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)), mood status (Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale), self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale), and health-related control (health locus of control (HLC)). A mixed-model ANOVA showed significant time × group × GCS interaction (within subjects: F = 23.830, p value<0.001; between subjects: F = 39.078, p value<0.001). With regard to HLC, there was a non-significant between subjects but a significant within-subjects effect (HLC × group × time, F = 3.848, p value = 0.024). Regarding DASS scores, there was a significant between-subjects' effect (F = 10.258, p value = 0.003) but a non-significant within-subjects' effect. With regard to PSQI, the analysis showed significant within-subjects' effects (PSQI × group × time: F = 4.691, p value = 0.003) and non-significant between-subjects' effects (F = 0.022, p = 0.883). Finally, regarding RSS, there was a significant within-subjects' (RSS × group × time, F = 4.183, p value = 0.029) but non-significant between-subjects' effect (F = 1.582, p value = 0.213). Stress management may offer an alternative approach to the management of climacteric symptoms.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:25Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques III
The Role of Exercise in Stress Management
Regular physical activity is essential for reducing stress and promoting cardiovascular health. Exercise strengthens the heart, enhances blood flow, keeps blood vessels flexible, and helps lower blood pressure, all of which reduce the body's stress response. Research shows that adults who exercise regularly have nearly half the...
01:20Psychological Responses to Stress
01:26Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques I
Conscientiousness
Conscientious individuals tend to be organized, responsible, and disciplined. They prioritize completing tasks and following structured routines,...
01:30Stress and Mental Health
Individuals with depression often experience challenges in both their personal and professional...
01:26Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques IV
01:23Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques II
Type A Personality: Driven and Easily Stressed
Individuals with Type A personalities are often highly competitive and ambitious and operate with a strong sense of urgency. Commonly labeled as...