Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

1.4K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Navigation experience and mental representations of the environment: do pilots build better cognitive maps?

PloS one·2014
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.3K

Individual differences in the allocation of visual attention during navigation.

Mikayla Keller1, Jennifer E Sutton2

  • 1Department of Psychology.

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale
|March 25, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Differences in cognitive map accuracy are not due to how long people look at landmarks. Instead, internal cognitive processes after attention allocation, like mental perspective-taking, impact spatial memory and navigation skills.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.1K
Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model
06:30

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

5.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.3K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.1K
Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model
06:30

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

5.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • Individual differences in creating accurate cognitive maps of novel environments are well-documented.
  • The underlying mechanisms driving these differences in cognitive map accuracy remain under investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether overt attention allocation, measured by looking times to environmental features, correlates with cognitive map accuracy.
  • To explore the relationship between visual attention during navigation and subsequent spatial memory and orientation abilities.

Main Methods:

  • Participants navigated a dynamic virtual environment (Silcton) and completed spatial skill assessments.
  • Eye-tracking measured looking times to landmarks and objects during navigation.
  • Cognitive map accuracy was assessed using direction estimation and map-building tasks post-navigation.

Main Results:

  • Individuals with less accurate cognitive maps exhibited similar looking times to landmarks as those with accurate maps.
  • Despite equivalent visual attention, inaccurate mappers performed significantly worse on relative direction judgments and landmark memory tasks.
  • This suggests attention allocation alone does not determine cognitive map quality.

Conclusions:

  • Differences in cognitive map accuracy are likely influenced by post-attentional cognitive mechanisms, such as mental perspective-taking.
  • Visual attention during exploration is not the primary determinant of individual differences in spatial representation accuracy.
  • Further research should focus on internal cognitive processes beyond initial attention allocation to understand spatial navigation differences.