Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Arm muscle plus bone area: anthropometry and CAT scan compared.

G B Forbes1, M R Brown, H J Griffiths

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, NY 14642.

The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
|June 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advances and shortfalls in knowledge of Antarctic terrestrial and freshwater biodiversity.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Acceptability of childhood screening: a systematic narrative review.

Public health·2021
Same author

Correction: Management of nystagmus in children: a review of the literature and current practice in UK specialist services.

Eye (London, England)·2020
Same author

Management of nystagmus in children: a review of the literature and current practice in UK specialist services.

Eye (London, England)·2020
Same author

Evaluating the impact of information and support for people with nystagmus in the digital age: A patient and carer questionnaire study.

Current eye research·2019
Same author

Cross-disciplinarity in the advance of Antarctic ecosystem research.

Marine genomics·2017
Same journal

Nourishing Collaboration: Interdisciplinary Nutrition Education for Health Care Professionals.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same journal

Associations of red blood cell fatty acids with personality traits: 10-year follow-up in the Kibbutzim Family Study.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to: Vitamin D status and breast cancer in Saudi Arabian women: case-control study [Am J Clin Nutr 98 (2013) 105-110].

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same journal

High postprandial endotoxemia is associated with recurrence of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease: from the CORDIOPREV randomized clinical trial.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same journal

Reply to Wu et al.: "Nitrate and nitrite food composition database: an update and extensive deep dive".

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same journal

Reframing Basic Experimental Studies in Humans-Implications for Nutrition Science.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
See all related articles

Estimating arm muscle plus bone area using anthropometry overestimates results compared to CAT scans. This overestimation is greater in individuals with higher arm fat levels.

Area of Science:

  • Body composition analysis
  • Anthropometry and medical imaging

Background:

  • Accurate measurement of muscle and bone cross-sectional area is crucial for clinical and research applications.
  • Traditional anthropometric methods are cost-effective but may lack precision compared to advanced imaging techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of anthropometric estimations of arm muscle plus bone (M + B) cross-sectional area with computed tomography (CAT) scans.
  • To investigate the influence of arm adiposity on the accuracy of anthropometric measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional area of the arm was estimated using anthropometric measurements (circumference and skinfold thickness).
  • Arm M + B area was also determined using CAT scans for comparison.
  • Statistical analysis was performed to compare the two methods and assess the correlation with arm adiposity.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The anthropometric technique consistently overestimated the M + B cross-sectional area of the arm.
  • The degree of overestimation was found to be directly proportional to the level of arm adiposity.
  • CAT scans provided a more precise measurement of M + B area.

Conclusions:

  • Anthropometric estimation of arm M + B area is prone to overestimation, particularly in individuals with higher body fat.
  • CAT scans are a more reliable method for accurately quantifying arm muscle plus bone area.
  • Clinical assessments relying solely on anthropometry may need to account for potential overestimation due to adiposity.