Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Interference: Path Lengths

Interference: Path Lengths

Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

Sampling Theorem

Sampling Theorem

In signal processing, the analysis of continuous-time signals, denoted as x(t), often involves sampling techniques to convert these signals into discrete-time signals. This process is essential for digital representation and manipulation. A critical component in sampling is the train of impulses, characterized by the sampling interval and the sampling frequency. The relationship between these parameters and the original signal's properties dictates the success of the sampling process.

Echo

Echo

The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...

Auditory Perception

Auditory Perception

The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Comparing those Most Satisfied Versus Least Satisfied Following Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Are there Differences in Baseline Characteristics?

Spine·2026

Same author

Concordance Between Bedside and Electronic Detection of Intracranial Pressure Crises: Insights From the Brain Tissue Oxygen Monitoring and Management in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury II Trial.

Critical care medicine·2026

Same author

A Multi-Department Investigation of Occupational Well-Being, Systemic Features, and Organizational Outcomes in Anesthesiology Using the Well-Being Influencers Survey for Healthcare (WISH).

Anesthesiology·2026

Same author

Evaluating the Duke Iterative Cognitive Examination Against the Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Validity and Clinical Utility.

Neurology. Clinical practice·2026

Same author

Does insurance type influence patient-reported satisfaction at 60 months following surgery for cervical myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data.

Neurosurgical focus·2026

Same author

Age- and level-dependent glucose metabolism in the lumbar spine and preliminary associations with severe low back pain: A retrospective FDG PET imaging study.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 11, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Comparisons in Frequency Difference Limens Between Sequential and Simultaneous Listening Conditions in Normal-Hearing

Yang-Soo Yoon¹, Ivy Mills¹, BaileyAnn Toliver¹

¹Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Baylor University, Waco, TX.

American Journal of Audiology

|March 26, 2021

Summary

Frequency discrimination is better when tones are heard sequentially compared to simultaneously for complex sounds. The three-tone complex offered the best frequency difference limens (FDLs) in both listening conditions.

More Related Videos

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

Neuro-rehabilitation Approach for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Neuro-rehabilitation Approach for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Published on: January 25, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 11, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

Neuro-rehabilitation Approach for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Neuro-rehabilitation Approach for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Published on: January 25, 2016

Area of Science:

Auditory Neuroscience
Psychoacoustics
Human Hearing Perception

Background:

Frequency difference limens (FDLs) are crucial for understanding auditory processing.
Investigating FDLs under different listening conditions (sequential vs. simultaneous) provides insight into auditory pathway mechanisms.
Previous research has explored frequency discrimination, but direct comparisons of sequential and simultaneous complex tone processing are less common.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare frequency difference limens (FDLs) in normal-hearing listeners between sequential and simultaneous auditory presentation conditions.
To examine the effect of tone complexity (single, two-tone, or three-tone complexes) on FDLs.
To determine how different testing frequencies influence FDLs under the two listening conditions.

Main Methods:

Eighteen adult listeners with normal hearing participated in three experiments.
Frequency difference limens (FDLs) were measured using a method of limits with varying reference and comparison tones (single, two-, or three-tone complexes).
Tones were presented either sequentially (0.5s interval) or simultaneously to the left and right ears.

Main Results:

FDLs were significantly worse (broader) in the simultaneous condition compared to the sequential condition for two- and three-tone complexes, but not for single tones.
The three-tone complex yielded the narrowest (best) FDLs in both sequential and simultaneous listening.
FDLs generally worsened with increasing frequency for single and two-tone complexes, but not for the three-tone complex above 250 Hz.

Conclusions:

Sequential and simultaneous frequency discrimination appear to involve different neural processes for complex tones.
These distinct processes likely occur at different stages within the auditory pathway.
Pure tones may not engage the same complex processing mechanisms as multi-tone complexes.