Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
Published on: June 14, 2019
Why do learners ignore expected feedback in making metacognitive decisions about retrieval practice?
Thomas C Toppino1, Kelsey A Heslin2, Taylor M Curley2
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, PA, 19085, USA. thomas.toppino@villanova.edu.
Learners often miss that feedback after retrieval practice is a restudy chance. Alerting them to this restudy function significantly improved their learning choices and strategy effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Educational Psychology
- Metacognition
Background:
- Learners often fail to utilize feedback effectively after retrieval practice.
- The potential of feedback as a restudy opportunity is frequently overlooked in metacognitive judgments.
- Existing research suggests feedback is often ignored due to brevity or social desirability concerns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate why learners disregard the restudy potential of feedback following retrieval practice.
- To determine if specific experimental conditions can elucidate the underappreciation of feedback's restudy function.
- To examine how framing feedback influences learners' study choices and strategy selection.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments were conducted involving word-pair learning with initial study, judgment of learning (JOL), and subsequent practice decisions.
- Experiment 1 manipulated practice conditions (relearning, retrieval without feedback, retrieval with feedback) and feedback duration.
- Experiment 2 altered instructions to frame feedback as either an answer presentation or a restudy opportunity.
Main Results:
- In Experiment 1, learners consistently preferred longer spacing intervals for relearning but not for retrieval practice with feedback.
- Despite extended feedback and covert practice, learners chose short intervals for difficult items and long intervals for easy items, indicating suboptimal strategy use.
- In Experiment 2, framing feedback as a restudy opportunity significantly altered learners' choices compared to framing it as answer presentation.
Conclusions:
- Learners do not spontaneously recognize or utilize the restudy function of feedback after retrieval practice.
- Metacognitive judgments and subsequent learning strategy choices are influenced by how feedback is presented.
- Explicitly alerting learners to the restudy nature of feedback is crucial for them to leverage it effectively.
More Related Videos
12:55Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
08:05A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Metacognition
Hindsight Biases
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Purposive Learning
Forgetting
Encoding...
Introspection