Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Adapting Taylor Dispersion to Measure the Dispersion Coefficient of Electrolyte Solutions via an Accessible Microfluidic Setup
Published on: October 7, 2025
Using a deep convolutional network to predict the longitudinal dispersion coefficient
Behzad Ghiasi1, Ata Jodeiri2, Behnam Andik1
1School of Environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:
Given the interest in accurately predicting the Longitudinal Dispersion Coefficient (Dx) within the fields of hydraulic and water quality modeling, a wide range of methods have been used to estimate this parameter. In order to improve the accuracy of Dx predictions, this paper proposes the use of a Deep Convolutional Network (DCN), a sub-field of machine learning. The proposed deep neural network architecture consists of two parts; first, a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) to build informative feature maps, and second, a stack of deep, fully connected layers to estimate pollution dispersion (as Dx) in streams. To accurately predict Dx the developed model draws upon a large and diverse array of datasets in the form of three dimensionless parameters: Width/Depth (W/H), Velocity/Shear Velocity (U/u*), and Longitudinal Dispersion Coefficient/(Depth * Shear Velocity) (Dx /Hu*). The model's accuracy is compared to that of several empirical models using a number of statistical measures. In addition, the DCN model results are compared with artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) models implemented in this research and also similar studies applying various machine learning models (ML) towards Dx prediction. The statistical evaluation indicates that the DCN model outperforms the tested empirical, ANN, SVM and ML models with a significant difference. Additionally, five-fold cross-validation is performed to analyze the sensitivity and dependency of the DCN model's results on dataset selection, which shows that the dataset selection process does not significantly affect the model's accuracy. Since both ML and empirical models are, in general, poor predictors of the upper and lower ranges of Dx values, the DCN model's predictions of Dx in six different extreme-value ranges are assessed. The DCN model shows excellent accuracy in estimating Dx over the full possible range of data. In comparison with the empirical and ML models mentioned above, the DCN model more accurately predicts Dx values from river geometry and hydraulic datasets, with low errors across all ranges of Dx. The most significant advantage of DCN is that it tries to learn high-level features from data in an incremental manner.
Related Concept Videos
Diffusion on Chromatography Columns
Longitudinal diffusion occurs when the solute molecules in the mobile phase diffuse from the more concentrated center of the chromatographic band to the more dilute regions on either side, both towards and against the flow direction. This...
Van der Waals Interactions
Distribution and Dispersion
Deconvolution
Deconvolution involves several mathematical techniques to derive the impulse response. One common approach is polynomial division. In this method, the input and output sequences are treated as coefficients of...
Residuals and Least-Squares Property
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
Linear Approximation in Frequency Domain
In contrast, nonlinear systems do not inherently possess these properties. However, for small deviations around an operating point, a nonlinear system can often be approximated as linear....

