Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.3K
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.7K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.7K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

410
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
410
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.7K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.1K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.1K
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

16.5K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Can Evidential Pluralism mitigate bias and motivated reasoning?

Synthese·2026
Same journal

AI-assisted rational decision-making.

Synthese·2026
Same journal

Technological Understanding: On the cognitive skill involved in the design and use of technological artefacts.

Synthese·2026
Same journal

Addictive Motivational Scaffolds and the Structure of Social Media.

Synthese·2026
Same journal

When do we experience effort?

Synthese·2026
Same journal

Prescriptive 'selves' and self-illness ambiguity.

Synthese·2025
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.2K

Do we really need a knowledge-based decision theory?

Davide Fassio1,2, Jie Gao1,2

  • 1Department of Philosophy, Zhejiang University, Yuhangtang Road 866, Xihu District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang China.

Synthese
|March 29, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study questions the benefits of knowledge-based decision theory (KBDT), finding it inherits problems from other theories without unique advantages. Researchers conclude KBDT needs a stronger rationale for adoption in decision theory.

Keywords:
Decision TheoryKnowledgeKnowledge-based decision theoryRationality

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.0K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

14.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.2K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.0K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

14.0K

Area of Science:

  • Decision Theory
  • Epistemology
  • Rationality Studies

Background:

  • Knowledge-based decision theory (KBDT) is proposed as a rational framework aligning with intuitive notions of acting on one's knowledge.
  • KBDT is often seen as a middle ground between subjective and objective decision theories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the purported advantages of adopting knowledge-based decision theory (KBDT).
  • To determine if KBDT offers a superior framework for understanding rationality and decision-making compared to existing theories.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of existing arguments for KBDT.
  • Comparative evaluation of KBDT against subjectivist and objectivist decision theories.
  • Examination of KBDT's explanatory power regarding the knowledge-action link.

Main Results:

  • The alleged advantages of KBDT do not withstand scrutiny.
  • KBDT shares weaknesses with competing decision theories without retaining their strengths.
  • KBDT fails to fully account for the intuitive relationship between knowledge and rational action.

Conclusions:

  • KBDT faces significant challenges in justifying its adoption.
  • A substantive rationale is required for knowledge-based decision theorists to overcome existing criticisms.