Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.1K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.1K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

419
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
419
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

4.4K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
4.4K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

5.3K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
5.3K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.0K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.0K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.6K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Implementing and evaluating a seminar-case learning model in postgraduate orthodontic education: perceived effectiveness, student experience, and influencing factors.

BMC medical education·2026
Same author

Association between semaglutide 2.4 mg and risk of cardiovascular events in people with overweight or obesity without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the real-world: The SCORE - primary prevention study.

American journal of preventive cardiology·2026
Same author

C-di-AMP inhibition-propelled unlocking bacterial cuproptosis accelerates tissue remodeling and confers long-lasting immunoprotection.

Biomaterials·2026
Same author

The YTHDC1-m<sup>6</sup>A-GADD45B axis promotes chondrogenesis of hPDLSCs via suppressing senescence through p53/p21 signalling pathway.

International journal of oral science·2026
Same author

Wireless flexible patch based on ultrasound-responsive SenA@ZIF-8 release for on-demand medication of periodontitis.

Journal of nanobiotechnology·2026
Same author

Nitrogen-doped nano-mosaic with platelet membrane reversely targets neutrophils to break the ROS-NETs circuit in diabetic periodontitis.

Biomaterials·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.4K

Sequential Tests of Multiple Hypotheses Controlling False Discovery and Nondiscovery Rates.

Jay Bartroff1, Jinlin Song2

  • 1Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Sequential Analysis
|March 29, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a flexible method for analyzing sequential data, simultaneously controlling false discovery rate (FDR) and false nondiscovery rate (FNR) with minimal data assumptions. The procedure extends existing methods for streaming data analysis.

Keywords:
62J1562L10Generalized likelihood ratioMultiple comparisonsMultiple endpoint clinical trialsMultiple testingSequential analysisSequential hypothesis testingWald approximations

More Related Videos

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

7.0K
How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.4K
Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

7.0K
How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Data Science
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Sequential data analysis presents challenges in controlling statistical error rates.
  • Existing methods often require strong assumptions about data distribution or independence.
  • Simultaneous control of false discovery rate (FDR) and false nondisclosure rate (FNR) is crucial for reliable streaming data interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a general and flexible procedure for multiple hypothesis testing on sequential data.
  • To simultaneously control both the false discovery rate (FDR) and false nondisclosure rate (FNR).
  • To minimize assumptions regarding data stream characteristics like distribution, dimension, and dependence.

Main Methods:

  • The proposed procedure extends the Benjamini and Hochberg (1995) fixed sample size method to sequential data.
  • It requires only a test statistic for each data stream that controls type I and II error probabilities.
  • No assumptions are needed about the joint distribution of statistics or data streams, accommodating dependent and heterogeneous data.

Main Results:

  • The procedure guarantees simultaneous control of FDR and FNR for sequential hypothesis testing.
  • It is applicable to various sampling schemes including sequential, group sequential, and truncated designs.
  • The method is proven to maintain error control under minimal assumptions.

Conclusions:

  • The developed procedure offers a robust and adaptable framework for hypothesis testing in streaming data environments.
  • It provides simultaneous FDR and FNR control, enhancing the reliability of findings from sequential analyses.
  • This method represents a significant advancement for statistical inference with complex, evolving datasets.