Plastibell circumcision: Comparison between neonates and infants

Osama A Bawazir1,2, Wejdan Rubayyi S Alsaiari3

  • 1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Urology Annals
|March 29, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Plastibell circumcision complications are higher in infants than neonates, with retained rings being most common. This method remains a low-hemorrhage option for outpatient infant circumcisions.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Urology

Background:

  • The Plastibell circumcision technique is popular globally due to low bleeding risk, suitable for vulnerable populations and late circumcisions.
  • Prolonged retention of the Plastibell ring has been associated with complications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess outcomes of Plastibell circumcision.
  • To report ring-related complications.
  • To compare complications between neonates and infants.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of 989 male neonates and infants.
  • Plastibell circumcision performed by a single surgeon (June 2006-February 2018).
  • Postoperative complications analyzed and compared between age groups.

Main Results:

  • Complications occurred in 4.4% of neonates and 17% of infants (P < 0.001).
  • Retained ring (4.6%) was the most frequent complication, followed by excess skin (2%).
  • Bleeding (1%), infection (0.7%), and hematoma (0.2%) were also reported.

Conclusions:

  • Plastibell circumcision shows significantly higher complication rates in infants compared to neonates.
  • Ring retention is the primary complication in both groups.
  • Low risk of severe hemorrhage makes it a viable outpatient option for infant circumcision.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos