Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
q-Space Imaging Yields a Higher Effect Gradient to Assess Cellularity than Conventional Diffusion-weighted Imaging
Nicholas Senn1, Yazan Masannat1, Ehab Husain1
1Institute of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland (N.S., S.D.H., J.H.); Breast Unit (Y.M., S.D.H.) and Department of Pathology (E.H.), Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Scotland; and MRI Unit, The Francis Crick Institute, London, England (B.S.).
Purpose:
To determine whether q-space imaging (QSI), an advanced diffusion-weighted MRI method, provides a higher effect gradient to assess tumor cellularity than existing diffusion imaging methods, and fidelity to cellularity obtained from histologic analysis.
Materials And Methods:
In this prospective study, diffusion-weighted images were acquired from 20 whole-breast tumors freshly excised from participants (age range, 35-78 years) by using a clinical 3.0-T MRI unit. Median and skewness values were extracted from the histogram distributions obtained from QSI, monoexponential model, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and stretched exponential model (SEM). The skewness from QSI and other diffusion models was compared by using paired t tests and relative effect gradient obtained from correlating skewness values.
Results:
The skewness obtained from QSI (mean, 1.34 ± 0.77 [standard deviation]) was significantly higher than the skewness from monoexponential fitting approach (mean, 1.09 ± 0.67; P = .015), SEM (mean, 1.07 ± 0.70; P = .014), and DKI (mean, 0.97 ± 0.63; P = .004). QSI yielded a higher effect gradient in skewness (percentage increase) compared with monoexponential fitting approach (0.26 of 0.74; 35.1%), SEM (0.26 of 0.74; 35.1%), and DKI (0.37 of 0.63; 58.7%). The skewness and median from QSI were significantly correlated with the skewness (ρ = -0.468; P = .038) and median (ρ = -0.513; P = .021) of cellularity from histologic analysis.
Conclusion:
QSI yields a higher effect gradient in assessing breast tumor cellularity than existing diffusion methods, and fidelity to underlying histologic structure.Keywords: Breast, MR-Diffusion Weighted Imaging, MR-Imaging, Pathology, Tissue Characterization, Tumor ResponseOnline supplemental material is available for this article.Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion
The Role of Diffusion in Respiration
Diffusion is the process by which molecules move from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In the respiratory system, this...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

