Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Acetylcholine Re-Challenge After Intracoronary Nitroglycerine Administration
Published on: April 4, 2022
Reinforcing adherence to lipid-lowering therapy after an acute coronary syndrome: A pragmatic randomized controlled
Stefanos Zafeiropoulos1, Ioannis Farmakis2, Anastasios Kartas2
11st Department of Cardiology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; Elmezzi Graduate School of Molecular Medicine and Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research at Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Insights
An educational intervention improved lipid-lowering therapy adherence in acute coronary syndrome patients. However, this did not significantly increase low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal achievement rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Preventive Medicine
- Health Behavior Research
Background:
- Achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is critical for secondary prevention.
- Suboptimal adherence to lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) often hinders LDL-C goal attainment in ACS survivors.
- The impact of improved adherence on LDL-C reduction in this population remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if an educational-motivational intervention enhances long-term LLT adherence among post-ACS patients.
- To determine if this intervention improves the rate of LDL-C goal achievement at one year.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial (IDEAL-LDL) involving 360 hospitalized ACS patients.
- Patients were assigned to an integrated intervention (education + motivational interviewing) or usual care.
- Co-primary outcomes included LLT adherence (Proportion of Days Covered >80%) and LDL-C goal attainment (<70 mg/dL or 50% reduction) at one year.
Main Results:
- The intervention group showed significantly higher median Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) compared to the control group (0.92 vs. 0.86, p=0.03).
- Patients receiving the intervention had increased odds of good LLT adherence (OR 1.76, p=0.04).
- No significant difference was observed in LDL-C goal achievement rates between the intervention (49.6%) and control (44.9%) groups (p=0.49).
Conclusions:
- A multifaceted educational-motivational intervention effectively improved LLT adherence in patients after ACS.
- Despite improved adherence, the intervention did not lead to a statistically significant increase in LDL-C goal attainment.
- Further strategies may be needed to translate improved adherence into better LDL-C goal achievement in post-ACS care.
Background And Aims:
Achieving the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a milestone often missed due to suboptimal adherence to secondary prevention treatments. Whether improved adherence could result in reduced LDL-C levels is unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether an educational-motivational intervention increases long-term lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) adherence and LDL-C goal attainment rate among post-ACS patients.
Methods:
IDEAL-LDL was a parallel, two-arm, single-center, pragmatic, investigator-initiated randomized controlled trial. Hospitalized patients for ACS were randomized to a physician-led integrated intervention consisting of an educational session at baseline, followed by regular motivational interviewing phone sessions or usual care. Co-primary outcomes were the LLT adherence (measured by Proportion of Days Covered (PDC); good adherence defined as PDC>80%), and LDL-C goal (<70 mg/dl or 50% reduction from baseline) achievement rate at one year.
Results:
In total, 360 patients (mean age 62 years, 81% male) were randomized. Overall, good adherence was positively associated with LDL-C goal achievement rate at one year. Median PDC was higher in the intervention group than the control group [0.92 (IQR, 0.82-1.00) vs. 0.86 (0.62-0.98); p = 0.03] while the intervention group had increased odds of good adherence (odds ratio: 1.76 (95% confidence interval 1.02 to 2.62; p = 0.04). However, neither the LDL-C goal achievement rate (49.6% in the intervention vs. 44.9% in the control group; p = 0.49) nor clinical outcomes differed significantly between the two groups.
Conclusions:
Α multifaceted intervention improved LLT adherence in post-ACS patients without a significant difference in LDL-C goal attainment.
More Related Videos
09:15Differential Effects of Lipid-lowering Drugs in Modulating Morphology of Cholesterol Particles
Published on: November 10, 2017
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies