Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Minimally Invasive Versus Sternotomy for Mitral Surgery in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Ali Hage1,2, Fadi Hage1,2, Hussein Al-Amodi1
1622170384 Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Objective:
The safety of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) in elderly patients is still debated. Our objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing MIMVS with conventional sternotomy (CS) in elderly patients (≥65 years old).
Methods:
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for trials and observational studies comparing MIMVS with CS in patients ≥65 years old presenting for mitral valve surgery. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of all outcomes.
Results:
The MIMVS group had lower odds of acute renal failure (odds ratio [OR] 0.27; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.78), prolonged intubation (>48 h; OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.70), less blood product transfusion (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.82 units; 95% CI -1.29 to -0.34 units), shorter ICU length of stay (LOS; WMD -2.57 days; 95% CI -3.24 to -1.90 days) and hospital LOS (WMD -4.06 days; 95% CI -5.19 to -2.94 days). There were no significant differences in the odds of mortality, stroke, respiratory infection, reoperation for bleeding, and postoperative atrial fibrillation. MIMVS was associated with longer cross-clamp (WMD 11.8 min; 95% CI 3.5 to 20.1 min) and cardiopulmonary bypass times (WMD 23.0 min; 95% CI 10.4 to 35.6 min).
Conclusions:
MIMVS in elderly patients is associated with lower postoperative complications, blood transfusion, shorter ICU, and hospital LOS, and longer cross-clamp and bypass times.
Insights
Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) in elderly patients shows fewer complications and shorter hospital stays compared to conventional sternotomy (CS). However, MIMVS involves longer cross-clamp and bypass times, with similar mortality rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Procedures
Background:
- The safety and efficacy of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) in elderly patients (≥65 years) remain subjects of ongoing debate.
- Conventional sternotomy (CS) is the traditional approach for mitral valve surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze existing studies comparing MIMVS with CS in elderly patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.
- To evaluate postoperative outcomes, including complications, length of stay, and procedural times.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science) and clinical trial registries.
- Included were randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing MIMVS and CS in patients aged 65 and older.
- A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to synthesize data on various outcomes.
Main Results:
- MIMVS was associated with significantly lower odds of acute renal failure, prolonged intubation, and reduced need for blood product transfusion.
- Patients undergoing MIMVS experienced shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay (LOS).
- No significant differences were observed in mortality, stroke, respiratory infection, reoperation for bleeding, or postoperative atrial fibrillation rates. MIMVS did involve longer cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times.
Conclusions:
- Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) offers significant advantages in reducing postoperative complications and hospital LOS for elderly patients compared to conventional sternotomy (CS).
- Despite longer procedural times (cross-clamp and bypass), MIMVS demonstrates a favorable safety profile in this demographic.
- These findings support the consideration of MIMVS as a viable option for elderly patients requiring mitral valve surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management

