Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 11, 2025

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Benefits of mitral valve repair over replacement in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ettorino Di Tommaso1, Filippo Rapetto2, Gustavo A Guida2
1Bristol Medical School, Translational Health Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Objectives:
Mitral valve (MV) repair has demonstrated excellent short- and long-term outcomes, however, its merit in the elderly population is still debated. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies that have compared the MV repair to replacement in the elderly population.
Methods:
A systematic literature search was conducted for any study published on MV surgery on elderly patients (≥75 years old). A pooled risk-ratio meta-analysis was done to evaluate short-term mortality, postoperative complications, surgical timings, and long-term survival rates.
Results:
A total of nine retrospective observational studies were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. Pooled meta-analysis showed a reduced risk of short-term mortality for the MV repair group (risk ratio [RR] = 0.41 [0.24-0.71], p-value = .005). Postoperative neurological complications were in favor of repair, although not significantly (RR = 0.49 [0.21-1.11], p-value = .07). Operative timings (cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp time) were not different between the groups although no data were available on the complexity of the repairs. Long-term survival rates were in favor of the repairs (pooled treatment effect of -0.47 [-0.64; -0.29], p = .005).
Conclusions:
MV surgery is a safe and effective procedure for the elderly. MV repair demonstrated better short-term outcomes compared to replacement. Long-term survival rates are significantly better after repair.
Insights
Mitral valve repair in elderly patients (≥75 years) shows reduced short-term mortality and better long-term survival compared to replacement. This meta-analysis confirms repair as a safe and effective option for this demographic.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Geriatric Medicine
- Medical Statistics
Background:
- Mitral valve (MV) repair offers excellent outcomes, but its efficacy in elderly patients (≥75 years) remains debated.
- Surgical intervention for mitral valve disease in the elderly requires careful consideration of risks and benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a meta-analysis comparing mitral valve repair versus replacement in patients aged 75 years and older.
- To evaluate short-term mortality, postoperative complications, operative times, and long-term survival rates for both procedures.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search for studies on mitral valve surgery in elderly patients (≥75 years).
- Pooled risk-ratio meta-analysis of nine retrospective observational studies.
- Evaluation of short-term mortality, neurological complications, cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp times, and long-term survival.
Main Results:
- Mitral valve repair significantly reduced short-term mortality (RR=0.41, p=0.005).
- Postoperative neurological complications favored repair, though not statistically significant (RR=0.49, p=0.07).
- Long-term survival rates were significantly better following mitral valve repair (pooled effect=-0.47, p=0.005).
Conclusions:
- Mitral valve surgery is a safe and effective procedure for elderly patients.
- Mitral valve repair demonstrates superior short-term outcomes and significantly better long-term survival compared to replacement in the elderly population.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction

