Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A method for direct estimation of imprecision profiles, with reference to immunoassay data.

W A Sadler1, M H Smith, H M Legge

  • 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand.

Clinical Chemistry
|June 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary

Directly estimating immunoassay imprecision profiles offers advantages near the detection limit, especially when assay details are unavailable. However, this method may be less reliable with limited data or at high concentrations compared to indirect models.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mitochondrial STAT3-mediated suppression of apoptosis constrains antimycobacterial immunity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Estimating repeatability profiles.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation·2020
Same author

Racial Differences in Accepting Pegfilgrastim Onpro Kit (On-Body Injector) Use Among Cancer Patients.

Clinics of oncology·2019
Same author

COMPARATIVE POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE OF A PARASITE (FASCIOLOIDES MAGNA) AND ITS DEFINITIVE HOST.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

Oxygen Saturation Measurements of Blood in Retinal Vessels during Blood Loss.

Journal of biomedical optics·2012
Same author

Preliminary assessment of RX 72601, a new anticholinesterase in man: reversal of competitive neuromuscular blockade.

British journal of clinical pharmacology·2012

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Laboratory Medicine

Background:

  • Imprecision profiles are crucial for understanding assay variability.
  • Traditional indirect methods combine raw measurement error with standard curve slope.
  • Direct estimation offers an alternative approach using replicated immunoassay results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare a three-parameter direct imprecision profile model with a six-parameter indirect model.
  • To evaluate the performance of direct estimation under different assay conditions.
  • To identify scenarios where direct estimation is advantageous.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a three-parameter model for direct imprecision profile estimation.
  • Compared direct estimation with a conventional six-parameter indirect model.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed performance based on data limitations and concentration ranges.

    • Main Results:

    • Direct estimation can be less reliable with limited data or at high concentrations.
    • Direct estimation outperforms indirect methods near the assay detection limit, particularly with logistic standard curves.
    • Indirect methods may underestimate variability at high concentrations.

    Conclusions:

    • Direct estimation is valuable when internal assay details are inaccessible, such as in external surveys.
    • Direct estimation provides superior performance near the assay detection limit.
    • The choice between direct and indirect methods depends on data availability and concentration of interest.