Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Halogenated Agent Delivery in Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome via an Intensive Care Unit Type Device
Published on: September 24, 2020
Rapid Development of a Tool for Prioritizing Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 for Intensive Care
Melyssa Roy1, Paul Hansen2,3, Trudy Sullivan1
1Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand.
Objectives:
To explain and demonstrate a new approach for rapidly developing a decision-support tool for prioritizing patients with coronovirus 2019 disease for admission to ICUs.
Design:
An expert group used multi-criteria decision analysis methods to specify criteria and weights, representing their relative importance, for prioritizing patients with coronovirus 2019 disease with respect to likely clinical benefit. Specialized multi-criteria decision analysis software, implementing the "Potentially All Pairwise RanKings of all possible Alternatives" method to determine the weights, was used. Social equity considerations for prioritizing patients were also identified as important.
Setting:
The prioritization tool was developed in New Zealand.
Subjects:
An expert group comprising specialists from intensive care medicine and nursing, Māori (New Zealand's indigenous population) health, infectious diseases, and neonatology was formed. The group's work was supported by health economists and decision analysts and overseen by an ethicist and a senior representative from the New Zealand Ministry of Health.
Interventions:
Multi-criteria decision analysis to create a prioritization tool.
Measurements And Main Results:
The prioritization tool comprised eight criteria with respect to likely clinical benefit. In decreasing order of importance (weights in parentheses): Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (15.7%), preexisting cardiovascular conditions (15.7%), functional capacity (15.7%), age (12.4%), preexisting respiratory conditions (11.1%), immunocompromised (11.1%), body mass index (9.2%), and other relevant medical conditions (9.2%). Two social equity considerations were also included in the overarching decision framework to be used alongside the clinical criteria: prioritizing Māori and Pacific people (and, potentially, other at-risk groups), and healthcare and other frontline workers.
Conclusions:
The criteria and weights in the prioritization tool can be easily revised as new evidence emerges. The approach for developing the tool could be used in other countries whose ICUs are at risk of being overwhelmed by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic to rapidly develop their own prioritization tools. In the event that future crises threaten to overload ICUs, other prioritization tools could also be rapidly developed.
More Related Videos
07:16An Educational Video Demonstration of How to Prone a Critically Ill Intubated Patient
Published on: November 30, 2022
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:
Acute Respiratory Failure-I
Definition: It is defined by specific criteria based on blood gas measurements. Hypoxemia happens when the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) falls below 60 mmHg. At the same time,...
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Acute Respiratory Failure-III
Planning Nursing Care I