Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Multimodality Diagnosis of Mesenteric Ischemia
Published on: July 21, 2023
Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sangjune Laurence Lee1, Poonam Yadav1, Jitka Starekova1
1From the Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, 1331 29 St NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 4N2 (S.L.L.); Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (S.L.L., P.Y., M.F.B.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (J.S., S.B.R.); Departments of Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (S.B.R); University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (L.C.); Department of Statistics and Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis (T.C., R.C.).
Abstract:
Background Although CT, endoscopic US, and PET are critical in determining the appropriate management of esophageal carcinoma (squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma), previous reports show that staging accuracy remains low, particularly for nodal involvement sensitivity. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of MRI for multiple staging thresholds in patients with biopsy-proven esophageal carcinoma (differentiation of stage T0 disease from stage T1 or higher disease, differentiation of stage T2 or lower disease from stage T3 or higher disease, and differentiation of stage N0 disease from stage N1 or higher disease [where T refers to tumor stage and N refers to nodal stage]). Materials and Methods Studies of the diagnostic performance of MRI in determining the stage of esophageal carcinoma in patients before esophagectomy and pathologic staging between 2000 and 2019 were searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library by a librarian and radiation oncologist. Pooled diagnostic performance of MRI was calculated with a bivariate random effects model. Bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (version 2) tool. Results Twenty studies with a total of 984 patients were included in the analysis. Pooled accuracy for stage T0 versus stage T1 or higher had a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 82, 96) and a specificity of 67% (95% CI: 51, 81). Pooled accuracy for stage T2 or lower versus stage T3 or higher had a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI: 76, 92) and a specificity of 86% (95% CI: 75, 93). Pooled accuracy for stage N0 versus stage N1 or higher had a sensitivity of 71% (95% CI: 60, 80) and a specificity of 72% (95% CI: 64, 79). The concern for applicability was low for the patient selection, index test, and reference test domains, except for 10% of studies (two of 20) that had unclear concern for patient selection applicability. Conclusion MRI has high sensitivity but low specificity for the detection of esophageal carcinoma, which shows promise for determining neoadjuvant therapy response and for detecting locally advanced disease for potential trimodality therapy. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Leeflang in this issue.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:

