Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 10, 2025

Magnetic Resonance Derived Myocardial Strain Assessment Using Feature Tracking
Published on: February 12, 2011
Myocardial deformation in patients with a single left ventricle using 2D cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature
Fabian Strodka1, Jana Logoteta2, Roman Schuwerk1
1Department of Congenital Heart Disease and Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Insights
Single left ventricle (SLV) patients in Fontan circulation show reduced left ventricular (LV) strain despite preserved ejection fraction. Advanced imaging like 2D-CMR-FT and 2D-STE reveals subtle LV dysfunction in SLV patients compared to controls.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Single ventricle (SV) patients undergoing Fontan circulation often develop ventricular dysfunction.
- Studies focusing specifically on left ventricular (LV) function in single left ventricle (SLV) patients are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess left ventricular (LV) function and deformation in single left ventricle (SLV) patients using 2D-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (2D-CMR-FT) and 2D-speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE).
- To compare LV function between SLV patients and age-matched healthy controls.
- To explore differences in LV function between specific SLV subtypes (DILV and TA).
Main Methods:
- Utilized 2D-CMR-FT to measure LV global longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain (GLS, GCS, GRS) and strain rate (GLSR, GCSR, GRSR) in 54 SLV patients and 35 controls.
- Determined LV volumes, ejection fraction (LVEF), and mass from short-axis CMR images.
- Applied 2D-STE to measure peak systolic GLS and GLSR in patients.
Main Results:
- Median LVEF was lower in SLV patients (55.6%) compared to controls (61.2%) (p=0.0001).
- 2D-CMR-FT showed reduced GLS, GCS, and GCSR values in SLV patients versus controls.
- No significant differences in LVEF or strain parameters were found between double inlet left ventricle (DILV) and tricuspid atresia (TA) patients.
Conclusions:
- Although most SLV patients exhibit preserved LVEF by CMR, subtle impairments in LV deformation and function are detectable using advanced imaging techniques.
- 2D-CMR-FT and 2D-STE are valuable tools for assessing LV function in SLV patients.
- LV function may differ in SLV patients compared to healthy individuals, necessitating closer monitoring.
Abstract:
Ventricular dysfunction is a well-known complication in single ventricle patients in Fontan circulation. As studies exclusively examining patients with a single left ventricle (SLV) are sparse, we assessed left ventricular (LV) function in SLV patients by using 2D-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (2D-CMR-FT) and 2D-speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). 54 SLV patients (11.4, 3.1-38.1 years) and 35 age-matched controls (12.3, 6.3-25.8 years) were included. LV global longitudinal, circumferential and radial strain (GLS, GCS, GRS) and strain rate (GLSR, GCSR, GRSR) were measured using 2D-CMR-FT. LV volumes, ejection fraction (LVEF) and mass were determined from short axis images. 2D-STE was applied in patients to measure peak systolic GLS and GLSR. In a subgroup analysis, we compared double inlet left ventricle (DILV) with tricuspid atresia (TA) patients. The population consisted of 19 DILV patients, 24 TA patients and 11 patients with diverse diagnoses. 52 patients were in NYHA class I and 2 patients were in class II. Most SLV patients had a normal systolic function but median LVEF in patients was lower compared to controls (55.6% vs. 61.2%, p = 0.0001). 2D-CMR-FT demonstrated reduced GLS, GCS and GCSR values in patients compared to controls. LVEF correlated with GS values in patients (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between GLS values from 2D-CMR-FT and 2D-STE in the patient group. LVEF, LV volumes, GS and GSR (from 2D-CMR-FT) were not significantly different between DILV and TA patients. Although most SLV patients had a preserved EF derived by CMR, our results suggest that, LV deformation and function may behave differently in SLV patients compared to healthy subjects.
More Related Videos
11:13Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
09:05Transthoracic Speckle Tracking Echocardiography for the Quantitative Assessment of Left Ventricular Myocardial Deformation
Published on: October 20, 2016