Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 10, 2025

Hybrid De Novo Genome Assembly for the Generation of Complete Genomes of Urinary Bacteria using Short- and Long-read Sequencing Technologies
Published on: August 20, 2021
Expectations and blind spots for structural variation detection from long-read assemblies and short-read genome
Xuefang Zhao1, Ryan L Collins2, Wan-Ping Lee3
1Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Program in Medical and Population Genetics and Stanley Center for Psychiatric Disorders, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Short-read whole-genome sequencing (srWGS) has limitations in detecting structural variants (SVs), while long-read WGS (lrWGS) offers superior detection, especially for insertions and complex regions. lrWGS provides valuable insights into previously inaccessible genomic areas.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Bioinformatics
- Human Genetics
Background:
- Short-read whole-genome sequencing (srWGS) is the standard for large-scale genomic studies but struggles with structural variant (SV) detection.
- Long-read whole-genome sequencing (lrWGS) technologies are emerging as a powerful alternative for comprehensive genomic analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare SV detection capabilities between srWGS and lrWGS.
- To quantify the genomic properties and unique contributions of SVs identified by each technology.
- To establish expectations for routine SV detection using srWGS.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of SVs detected by srWGS and lrWGS assembly in three families from the Human Genome Structural Variation Consortium (HGSVC).
- Evaluation of SV detection power and precision across different genomic contexts and variant classes.
- Assessment of SVs in segmental duplication (SD) and simple repeat (SR) regions versus non-SD/SR regions.
Main Results:
- lrWGS assembly identified approximately twice as many SVs per genome (~25,000) compared to srWGS (~11,000).
- 91.4% of deletions uniquely identified by lrWGS were located in segmental duplication (SD) and simple repeat (SR) regions, which constitute 9.7% of the reference genome.
- High concordance (93.8%) for deletions was observed between srWGS and lrWGS in non-SD/SR regions, while lrWGS showed superior detection of insertions across all contexts.
Conclusions:
- While srWGS provides high concordance for deletions in non-repetitive regions, lrWGS significantly enhances the detection of insertions and SVs within complex genomic areas like SDs and SRs.
- Assembly-based lrWGS is crucial for creating comprehensive catalogs of insertions, transposable elements, and repeat expansions, particularly in disease-associated regions previously difficult to assess.
- The findings suggest incremental improvements for pathogenic deletion detection in disease-associated exons using lrWGS, but highlight its substantial value for novel variant discovery in recalcitrant genomic sequences.
Related Concept Videos
Genome Annotation and Assembly
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
RNA-seq
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Sanger Sequencing

